日韩中文字幕在线一区二区三区,亚洲热视频在线观看,久久精品午夜一区二区福利,精品一区二区三区在线观看l,麻花传媒剧电影,亚洲香蕉伊综合在人在线,免费av一区二区三区在线,亚洲成在线人视频观看
          訂閱

          多平臺閱讀

          微信訂閱

          雜志

          申請紙刊贈閱

          訂閱每日電郵

          移動應(yīng)用

          專欄 - 從華爾街到硅谷

          風(fēng)投出售公司數(shù)量減少不必?fù)?dān)心

          Dan Primack 2014年01月08日

          Dan Primack專注于報道交易和交易撮合者,從美國金融業(yè)到風(fēng)險投資業(yè)均有涉及。此前,Dan是湯森路透(Thomson Reuters)的自由編輯,推出了peHUB.com和peHUB Wire郵件服務(wù)。作為一名新聞工作者,Dan還曾在美國馬薩諸塞州羅克斯伯里經(jīng)營一份社區(qū)報紙。目前他居住在波士頓附近。
          2013年,由風(fēng)投出售的并購活動降至2009以來最低,相比2012年下降了僅四分之一。但這沒什么好擔(dān)心的。它表明,IPO市場走勢良好,大家不舍得輕易出手有上市潛力的資產(chǎn)。

          ????美國風(fēng)險投資協(xié)會(National Venture Capital Association)和湯森路透(Thomson Reuters)日前公布的數(shù)據(jù)顯示,去年風(fēng)投通過并購方式只出售了388家公司。這是2009年以來的最低水平,較2012年下降了近23%。

          ????聽起來很糟糕。但事實(shí)或許并非如此。

          ????IPO市場走勢強(qiáng)勁之時,比如就像2013年,風(fēng)投資本家們通常都不愿通過出售來退出勢頭最好的公司。當(dāng)然會有例外,比如輕博客Tumblr作價11億美元賣給了雅虎(Yahoo)。但大多數(shù)優(yōu)秀的公司要么IPO,申請IPO,要么預(yù)計(jì)在未來1、2年內(nèi)將進(jìn)行IPO(比如,AirBNB,Box,Dropbox,Square,Spotify,等等)。

          ????這意味著大多數(shù)并購標(biāo)的要么是中不溜的公司,以低于面值價格出售,要么是運(yùn)營不善,以白菜價出售。為什么這些交易只有25-35%公布了交易額?這就是原因。沒人愿意公布投資(或收購)一家公司的價錢可能還不如我已有七年車齡的豐田普瑞斯(Toyota Prius)。

          ????但如果風(fēng)投出售的公司數(shù)量少于過去多年,可能事實(shí)上意味著風(fēng)投的回報得到了提高。特別是,如果公布交易的平均交易額仍相對健康(在1.61億美元左右)。不然,就是我的反直覺中有什么漏洞?(財富中文網(wǎng))???????????

          ????Venture capitalists sold only 388 companies via mergers or acquisitions last year, according to data released this morning by the National Venture Capital Association and Thomson Reuters. It is the lowest such total since 2009, and nearly a 23% decline from 2012.

          ????Sounds pretty bad. But it probably isn't.

          ????When the IPO market is strong, as it was in 2013, venture capitalists are typically loathe to exit their best companies via trade sales. Sure there are exceptions -- Tumblr to Yahoo (YHOO) for $1.1 billion, for example -- but most of the upper crust either went public, filed to go public or is expecting to go public within the next year or two (think AirBNB, Box, Dropbox, Square, Spotify, etc.).

          ????What that means is that most of the M&A targets either are middling companies being dumped around par, or failed companies being sold for scrap. That's why only 25-35% of these deals ever have their values disclosed -- no one wants to publicize having funded (or bought) a company that is now worth less than my seven-year-old Toyota Prius.

          ????So if VCs are selling fewer companies than in years past, then it may actually mean the VCs are generating higher returns. Particularly if the average value of disclosed deals remains relatively healthy (which it was, at around $161 million). Or is there a flaw in my counterintuition??????

          我來點(diǎn)評

            最新文章

          最新文章:

          中國煤業(yè)大遷徙

          500強(qiáng)情報中心

          財富專欄