
經過多年對不同領域杰出人士的研究,頂尖心理學家安杰拉·達克沃斯確定了被她稱為最可靠的成功預測因素,這對認為天賦和智力才是成功關鍵的傳統觀念構成了挑戰。在周一發布的播客節目錄制中,擁有460萬YouTube訂閱者的作家梅爾·羅賓斯就這項研究成果采訪了達克沃斯。
達克沃斯解釋說:“無論他們取得的是什么成就,成功人士的共同點在于一種特殊的組合:對長期目標的激情與毅力。簡而言之,就是他們的‘堅毅’。”
作為賓夕法尼亞大學(University of Pennsylvania)教授和麥克阿瑟天才獎(MacArthur Fellow)得主,達克沃斯將堅毅定義為兩個隨時間推移而相互作用、相互關聯的組成部分。她說道:“就是這兩個部分,對吧?對長期目標的激情,比如熱愛某事并始終保持熱愛,而不是經常更換目標。他們始終有一個目標,如‘北極星’般指引著他們前進。”
達克沃斯認為,毅力同樣至關重要。“一方面是要付出努力,對吧?一方面你需要練習尚未掌握的技能,另一方面要有韌性。所以,所謂毅力的部分含義在于:在極其糟糕的日子里,你能否重新振作起來?”
研究表明,對孩子或西點軍校學員而言,堅毅是最重要的因素
達克沃斯自2007年開始的研究提出了一個觀點:堅毅品質優于傳統的成功預測指標。她對美國軍事學院(U.S. Military Academy)[西點軍校(West Point)]超過11,000名學員進行了多年研究,在入學時測量他們的"堅毅得分",并追蹤他們在以極其艱苦著稱的“野獸營”訓練計劃中的表現。
結果令人震驚:堅毅成為預測哪些學員能完成這項為期六周的高強度訓練的最有力指標,其預測效果超過了SAT成績、高中平均績點、體能測試,甚至超過了西點軍校的綜合“候選人總評分”。盡管通常有3%的新學員會在“野獸營”中途退出,但堅毅得分較高的學員堅持到底的可能性明顯更大。
軍校的傳統指標未能反映出最關鍵的因素:在面對極端挑戰時堅持下去的能力。
達克沃斯對全美拼字比賽(National Spelling Bee)選手的研究中也發現了類似規律。堅毅得分較高的孩子更有可能進入比賽后期階段,這與其智力水平無關。研究顯示,這些“堅毅型”選手更頻繁地進行研究人員所說的“刻意練習”:即獨自進行艱苦、往往不愉快的單詞背誦與學習,而不是選擇更輕松的方式,比如由他人出題測驗。
努力的方程式
達克沃斯的研究揭示了堅毅與傳統能力指標之間一種出人意料的關系。她在播客中對羅賓斯表示:“我認為,任何心理學家告訴你值得擁有的品質,在某種程度上都是可控的。我并不是說基因不會發揮作用,因為每位心理學家都會告訴你,基因在任何事情中都扮演一定角色——堅毅也不例外。但你知道,我們有多堅毅,很大程度上取決于我們的知識、所處的圈子和所處的環境。”
在一項研究中,達克沃斯發現智力較高的學生實際上比智力測試得分較低的同齡人更缺乏堅毅這種品質。這一發現表明,那些并非天賦異稟的人往往能通過更加努力和更堅定的決心來彌補這一差距,而他們的努力最終會獲得回報。在一所常春藤盟校,取得最高平均績點的是最堅毅的學生,而非最聰明的學生。
達克沃斯認為,在成就的方程式中,“努力會出現兩次”。她的公式如下:天賦 × 努力 = 技能,技能 × 努力 = 成就。
她在2017年接受《福布斯》雜志采訪時表示:“天賦是指當你投入努力時技能提升的速度。成就是指當你運用所掌握的技能時所取得的結果?!?/p>
重要提醒:堅毅并非萬能
達克沃斯的研究對教育政策討論和軍事訓練項目產生了影響,盡管她對這一特質所起作用的看法已有所改變。2018年,她在接受EdSurge采訪時承認:“當我們談論孩子們成長為幸福、健康、并能造福他人的成年人所需的品質時,這個清單很長。堅毅是其中一種品質,但并非唯一的品質?!?/p>
近期的研究既支持又完善了達克沃斯的發現。2019年一項關于西點軍校學員的研究(達克沃斯亦為合著者)發現,盡管堅毅仍是畢業的重要預測指標,但認知能力才是預測學業和軍事表現的最強指標。其他研究則質疑,堅毅是否在既有的人格特質(如責任心)之外,能帶來顯著的預測作用。
盡管學術界對堅毅作為獨立概念的獨特性仍有爭論,但核心見解依然具有吸引力:持續的努力與對長期目標的投入,往往比天賦本身更為重要。正如達克沃斯在2017年所說的那樣:“我們的潛力是一回事,如何運用它則是另一回事。”(財富中文網)
譯者:劉進龍
審校:汪皓
經過多年對不同領域杰出人士的研究,頂尖心理學家安杰拉·達克沃斯確定了被她稱為最可靠的成功預測因素,這對認為天賦和智力才是成功關鍵的傳統觀念構成了挑戰。在周一發布的播客節目錄制中,擁有460萬YouTube訂閱者的作家梅爾·羅賓斯就這項研究成果采訪了達克沃斯。
達克沃斯解釋說:“無論他們取得的是什么成就,成功人士的共同點在于一種特殊的組合:對長期目標的激情與毅力。簡而言之,就是他們的‘堅毅’。”
作為賓夕法尼亞大學(University of Pennsylvania)教授和麥克阿瑟天才獎(MacArthur Fellow)得主,達克沃斯將堅毅定義為兩個隨時間推移而相互作用、相互關聯的組成部分。她說道:“就是這兩個部分,對吧?對長期目標的激情,比如熱愛某事并始終保持熱愛,而不是經常更換目標。他們始終有一個目標,如‘北極星’般指引著他們前進。”
達克沃斯認為,毅力同樣至關重要。“一方面是要付出努力,對吧?一方面你需要練習尚未掌握的技能,另一方面要有韌性。所以,所謂毅力的部分含義在于:在極其糟糕的日子里,你能否重新振作起來?”
研究表明,對孩子或西點軍校學員而言,堅毅是最重要的因素
達克沃斯自2007年開始的研究提出了一個觀點:堅毅品質優于傳統的成功預測指標。她對美國軍事學院(U.S. Military Academy)[西點軍校(West Point)]超過11,000名學員進行了多年研究,在入學時測量他們的"堅毅得分",并追蹤他們在以極其艱苦著稱的“野獸營”訓練計劃中的表現。
結果令人震驚:堅毅成為預測哪些學員能完成這項為期六周的高強度訓練的最有力指標,其預測效果超過了SAT成績、高中平均績點、體能測試,甚至超過了西點軍校的綜合“候選人總評分”。盡管通常有3%的新學員會在“野獸營”中途退出,但堅毅得分較高的學員堅持到底的可能性明顯更大。
軍校的傳統指標未能反映出最關鍵的因素:在面對極端挑戰時堅持下去的能力。
達克沃斯對全美拼字比賽(National Spelling Bee)選手的研究中也發現了類似規律。堅毅得分較高的孩子更有可能進入比賽后期階段,這與其智力水平無關。研究顯示,這些“堅毅型”選手更頻繁地進行研究人員所說的“刻意練習”:即獨自進行艱苦、往往不愉快的單詞背誦與學習,而不是選擇更輕松的方式,比如由他人出題測驗。
努力的方程式
達克沃斯的研究揭示了堅毅與傳統能力指標之間一種出人意料的關系。她在播客中對羅賓斯表示:“我認為,任何心理學家告訴你值得擁有的品質,在某種程度上都是可控的。我并不是說基因不會發揮作用,因為每位心理學家都會告訴你,基因在任何事情中都扮演一定角色——堅毅也不例外。但你知道,我們有多堅毅,很大程度上取決于我們的知識、所處的圈子和所處的環境?!?/p>
在一項研究中,達克沃斯發現智力較高的學生實際上比智力測試得分較低的同齡人更缺乏堅毅這種品質。這一發現表明,那些并非天賦異稟的人往往能通過更加努力和更堅定的決心來彌補這一差距,而他們的努力最終會獲得回報。在一所常春藤盟校,取得最高平均績點的是最堅毅的學生,而非最聰明的學生。
達克沃斯認為,在成就的方程式中,“努力會出現兩次”。她的公式如下:天賦 × 努力 = 技能,技能 × 努力 = 成就。
她在2017年接受《福布斯》雜志采訪時表示:“天賦是指當你投入努力時技能提升的速度。成就是指當你運用所掌握的技能時所取得的結果?!?/p>
重要提醒:堅毅并非萬能
達克沃斯的研究對教育政策討論和軍事訓練項目產生了影響,盡管她對這一特質所起作用的看法已有所改變。2018年,她在接受EdSurge采訪時承認:“當我們談論孩子們成長為幸福、健康、并能造福他人的成年人所需的品質時,這個清單很長。堅毅是其中一種品質,但并非唯一的品質?!?/p>
近期的研究既支持又完善了達克沃斯的發現。2019年一項關于西點軍校學員的研究(達克沃斯亦為合著者)發現,盡管堅毅仍是畢業的重要預測指標,但認知能力才是預測學業和軍事表現的最強指標。其他研究則質疑,堅毅是否在既有的人格特質(如責任心)之外,能帶來顯著的預測作用。
盡管學術界對堅毅作為獨立概念的獨特性仍有爭論,但核心見解依然具有吸引力:持續的努力與對長期目標的投入,往往比天賦本身更為重要。正如達克沃斯在2017年所說的那樣:“我們的潛力是一回事,如何運用它則是另一回事。”(財富中文網)
譯者:劉進龍
審校:汪皓
After years of studying high achievers across diverse fields, top psychologist Angela Duckworth has identified what she calls the most reliable predictor of success—and it challenges conventional wisdom about talent and intelligence. Author Mel Robbins, who has 4.6 million subscribers on YouTube, recently asked Duckworth about her findings during a recording of her podcast, released Monday.
“The common denominator of high achievers, no matter what they’re achieving, is this special combination of passion and perseverance for really long-term goals,” Duckworth explains. “And in a word, it’s grit.”
Duckworth, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania and MacArthur Fellow, defines grit as two interconnected components that work together over time. “It’s these two parts, right? Passion for long-term goals, like loving something and staying in love with it. Not kind of wandering off and doing something else, and then something else again, and then something else again, but having a kind of North Star,” she said.
The perseverance component is equally crucial, according to Duckworth. “Partly, it’s hard work, right? Partly it’s practicing what you can’t yet do, and partly it’s resilience. So part of perseverance is, on the really bad days, do you get up again?”
In children or West Point cadets, research shows grit matters most
Duckworth’s research, which dates back to 2007, has pushed the idea that grit outperforms traditional predictors of success. She studied over 11,000 cadets across multiple years at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, measuring their “grit scores” upon entry and tracking their performance through the notoriously difficult “Beast Barracks” training program.
The results were striking: Grit proved to be the strongest predictor of which cadets would complete the grueling six-week program, outperforming SAT scores, high school GPA, physical fitness assessments, and even West Point’s comprehensive “Whole Candidate Score.” While 3% of new cadets typically leave during Beast Barracks, those with higher grit scores were significantly more likely to persist.
The academy’s traditional metrics failed to capture what mattered most: the ability to persist when facing extreme challenges.
Similar patterns emerged in Duckworth’s study of National Spelling Bee contestants. Children with higher grit scores were more likely to advance to later rounds of competition, regardless of their measured intelligence. The research showed that gritty spellers engaged more frequently in what researchers call “deliberate practice”: the effortful, often unenjoyable work of studying and memorizing words alone, rather than more pleasant activities like being quizzed by others.
The effort equation
Duckworth’s research revealed a counterintuitive relationship between grit and traditional measures of ability. “I think that absolutely anything that any psychologist tells you is a good thing to have is partly under control,” she told Robbins during the podcast. “I am not saying there aren’t genes that are at play, because every psychologist will tell you that that’s also part of the story for everything—grit included. But you know, how gritty we are is very much a function of what we know, who we’re around, and the places we go.”
In one study, Duckworth found smarter students actually had less grit than their peers who scored lower on intelligence tests. This finding suggests that individuals who aren’t naturally gifted often compensate by working harder and with greater determination—and their effort pays off. At an Ivy League university, the grittiest students, not the smartest ones, achieved the highest GPAs.
Duckworth believes “effort counts twice” in the achievement equation. Her formula is as follows: Talent × Effort = Skill, and Skill × Effort = Achievement.
“Talent is how quickly your skills improve when you invest effort. Achievement is what happens when you take your acquired skills and use them,” she told Forbes in 2017.
An important caveat: Grit isn’t everything
Duckworth’s work has influenced educational policy discussions and military training programs, though she has evolved her thinking about the trait’s role. In 2018, she acknowledged during an interview with EdSurge that “when we are talking about what kids need to grow up and live lives that are happy and healthy and good for other people, it’s a long list of things. Grit is on that list, but it is not the only thing on the list.”
Recent studies have both supported and refined Duckworth’s findings. A 2019 study of West Point cadets, which Duckworth also contributed to, found that while grit remained a significant predictor of graduation, cognitive ability was the strongest predictor of academic and military performance. Other research has questioned whether grit adds substantial predictive power beyond established personality traits like conscientiousness.
Despite ongoing scholarly debate about grit’s uniqueness as a construct, the core insight remains compelling: Sustained effort and commitment to long-term goals often matter more than natural ability alone. As Duckworth put it back in 2017, “Our potential is one thing. What we do with it is quite another.”