日韩中文字幕在线一区二区三区,亚洲热视频在线观看,久久精品午夜一区二区福利,精品一区二区三区在线观看l,麻花传媒剧电影,亚洲香蕉伊综合在人在线,免费av一区二区三区在线,亚洲成在线人视频观看
          首頁 500強 活動 榜單 商業 科技 商潮 專題 品牌中心
          雜志訂閱

          因疫情前再入院病人太多,美國一半醫院將受處罰

          處罰在推動醫院改進治療方面可以起作用,但并不完善。

          文本設置
          小號
          默認
          大號
          Plus(0條)

          據聯邦文件顯示,美國有近一半的醫院因為再入院病人數量過多,獲得的醫保賠付將有所降低。其中多家醫院仍然深陷新冠肺炎疫情造成的財政危機。

          相關處罰為醫院減少再入院計劃(Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program)第九輪實施期間作出,該計劃屬于《平價醫療法案》(Affordable Care Act),主要目標是提高醫療質量并降低成本。最新處罰的依據是2016年7月至2019年6月期間每家醫院的病例數量,因此今年大量涌入醫院的新冠肺炎患者并未包括在內。

          今年9月,美國醫療保險和醫療補助服務中心(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)曾經宣布,如果疫情導致的混亂局勢持續,可能會暫停處罰計劃,因為春季有不少暫停或延期手術的病例,導致評估醫院業績太困難。

          不過今年的處罰仍然有效。數據顯示,10月1日往前一年的聯邦財年里,醫保將降低2545家醫院的年度費用,平均降幅為0.69%,613家醫院被處以1%或更多罰款。

          在全美5267家醫院中,美國國會免除了2176家的處罰,因為相關醫院都是本地唯一的住院機構,或是專門收治精神病患者、兒童、退伍軍人、康復或長期護理病人的醫院。在醫療保險和醫療補助服務中心評估的3080家醫院中,有83%的醫院受到處罰。

          盡管受到最高額度3%處罰的醫院數量從56家下降到39家,但處罰的數量和嚴重程度基本與近年相當。由于罰款適用于新收取住院費,每家醫院的罰款總額要到7月30日財年結束后才能夠確認。

          “不幸的是,2021財年醫院肯定要因為再入院而接受處罰。”美國醫院協會(American Hospital Association)的政策主管阿金?德邁說,“醫院資金緊張,每一美元都很重要,所以處罰的影響巨大。”

          處罰主要原因包括:初診為充血性心力衰竭、心臟病發作、肺炎、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、髖關節或膝關節置換術、冠狀動脈旁路移植手術的有醫保患者重新入院。如果患者在出院后的30天內返回醫院,除了接受第二階段手術而按照計劃入院等情況,醫保都視之為再入院。

          如果某家醫院的再入院率高于全國同類病例的趨勢,醫院就會受到處罰。

          從一開始,該項目就遭到了反對,業界抱怨相關措施不夠精確,而且會懲罰治療低收入患者的醫院。這其實很不公平,因為低收入患者往往缺乏資源,很難確保康復成功。

          關注患者安全的健康質量顧問邁克爾?米倫森表示,處罰在推動醫院改進治療方面可以起作用,但并不完善。懲罰制度的設計者設想是,借此降低醫院通過病人再入院獲得的經濟利益,在醫保按服務付費模式下,醫院能夠收取兩次住院而不是一次住院費用。

          “各行業都抱怨處罰太嚴厲。”他說,“如果想告訴我說,不需要經濟激勵就可以做正確的選擇,因為過去總在做正確的事情,但事實并非如此。”(財富中文網)

          KHN(凱撒醫療新聞)是專門報道醫療話題的非營利新聞服務,為KFF(凱撒家庭基金會)獨立編輯項目,并不隸屬于凱撒醫療集團。

          譯者:馮豐

          審校:夏林

          據聯邦文件顯示,美國有近一半的醫院因為再入院病人數量過多,獲得的醫保賠付將有所降低。其中多家醫院仍然深陷新冠肺炎疫情造成的財政危機。

          相關處罰為醫院減少再入院計劃(Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program)第九輪實施期間作出,該計劃屬于《平價醫療法案》(Affordable Care Act),主要目標是提高醫療質量并降低成本。最新處罰的依據是2016年7月至2019年6月期間每家醫院的病例數量,因此今年大量涌入醫院的新冠肺炎患者并未包括在內。

          今年9月,美國醫療保險和醫療補助服務中心(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)曾經宣布,如果疫情導致的混亂局勢持續,可能會暫停處罰計劃,因為春季有不少暫停或延期手術的病例,導致評估醫院業績太困難。

          不過今年的處罰仍然有效。數據顯示,10月1日往前一年的聯邦財年里,醫保將降低2545家醫院的年度費用,平均降幅為0.69%,613家醫院被處以1%或更多罰款。

          在全美5267家醫院中,美國國會免除了2176家的處罰,因為相關醫院都是本地唯一的住院機構,或是專門收治精神病患者、兒童、退伍軍人、康復或長期護理病人的醫院。在醫療保險和醫療補助服務中心評估的3080家醫院中,有83%的醫院受到處罰。

          盡管受到最高額度3%處罰的醫院數量從56家下降到39家,但處罰的數量和嚴重程度基本與近年相當。由于罰款適用于新收取住院費,每家醫院的罰款總額要到7月30日財年結束后才能夠確認。

          “不幸的是,2021財年醫院肯定要因為再入院而接受處罰。”美國醫院協會(American Hospital Association)的政策主管阿金?德邁說,“醫院資金緊張,每一美元都很重要,所以處罰的影響巨大。”

          處罰主要原因包括:初診為充血性心力衰竭、心臟病發作、肺炎、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、髖關節或膝關節置換術、冠狀動脈旁路移植手術的有醫保患者重新入院。如果患者在出院后的30天內返回醫院,除了接受第二階段手術而按照計劃入院等情況,醫保都視之為再入院。

          如果某家醫院的再入院率高于全國同類病例的趨勢,醫院就會受到處罰。

          從一開始,該項目就遭到了反對,業界抱怨相關措施不夠精確,而且會懲罰治療低收入患者的醫院。這其實很不公平,因為低收入患者往往缺乏資源,很難確保康復成功。

          關注患者安全的健康質量顧問邁克爾?米倫森表示,處罰在推動醫院改進治療方面可以起作用,但并不完善。懲罰制度的設計者設想是,借此降低醫院通過病人再入院獲得的經濟利益,在醫保按服務付費模式下,醫院能夠收取兩次住院而不是一次住院費用。

          “各行業都抱怨處罰太嚴厲。”他說,“如果想告訴我說,不需要經濟激勵就可以做正確的選擇,因為過去總在做正確的事情,但事實并非如此。”(財富中文網)

          KHN(凱撒醫療新聞)是專門報道醫療話題的非營利新聞服務,為KFF(凱撒家庭基金會)獨立編輯項目,并不隸屬于凱撒醫療集團。

          譯者:馮豐

          審校:夏林

          Nearly half the nation’s hospitals, many of which are still wrestling with the financial fallout of the unexpected coronavirus, will get lower payments for all Medicare patients because of their history of readmitting patients, federal records show.

          The penalties are the ninth annual round of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program created as part of the Affordable Care Act’s broader effort to improve quality and lower costs. The latest penalties are calculated using each hospital case history between July 2016 and June 2019, so the flood of coronavirus patients that have swamped hospitals this year were not included.

          The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announced in September it may suspend the penalty program in the future if the chaos surrounding the pandemic, including the spring’s moratorium on elective surgeries, makes it too difficult to assess hospital performance.

          For this year, the penalties remain in effect. Retroactive to the federal fiscal year that began Oct. 1, Medicare will lower a year’s worth of payments to 2,545 hospitals, the data show. The average reduction is 0.69%, with 613 hospitals receiving a penalty of 1% or more.

          Out of 5,267 hospitals in the country, Congress has exempted 2,176 from the threat of penalties, either because they are critical access hospitals—defined as the only inpatient facility in an area—or hospitals that specialize in psychiatric patients, children, veterans, rehabilitation, or long-term care. Of the 3,080 hospitals CMS evaluated, 83% received a penalty.

          The number and severity of penalties were comparable to those of recent years, although the number of hospitals receiving the maximum penalty of 3% dropped from 56 to 39. Because the penalties are applied to new admission payments, the total dollar amount each hospital will lose will not be known until after the fiscal year ends on July 30.

          “It’s unfortunate that hospitals will face readmission penalties in fiscal year 2021,” said Akin Demehin, director of policy at the American Hospital Association. “Given the financial strain that hospitals are under, every dollar counts, and the impact of any penalty is significant.”

          The penalties are based on readmissions of Medicare patients who initially came to the hospital with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, heart attack, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hip or knee replacement, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Medicare counts as a readmission any of those patients who ended up back in any hospital within 30 days of discharge, except for planned returns like a second phase of surgery.

          A hospital will be penalized if its readmission rate is higher than expected given the national trends in any one of those categories.

          The industry has disapproved of the program since its inception, complaining the measures aren’t precise and it unfairly punishes hospitals that treat low-income patients, who often don’t have the resources to ensure their recoveries are successful.

          Michael Millenson, a health quality consultant who focuses on patient safety, said the penalties are a useful but imperfect mechanism to push hospitals to improve their care. The designers of the penalty system envisioned it as a way to neutralize the economic benefit hospitals get from readmitted patients under Medicare’s fee-for-service payment model, as they are otherwise paid for two stays instead of just one.

          “Every industry complains the penalties are too harsh,” he said. “if you’re going to tell me we don’t need any economic incentives to do the right thing because we’re always doing the right thing—that’s not true.”

          KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a nonprofit news service covering health issues. It is an editorially independent program of KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation) that is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

          財富中文網所刊載內容之知識產權為財富媒體知識產權有限公司及/或相關權利人專屬所有或持有。未經許可,禁止進行轉載、摘編、復制及建立鏡像等任何使用。
          0條Plus
          精彩評論
          評論

          撰寫或查看更多評論

          請打開財富Plus APP

          前往打開