
? 隨著遠(yuǎn)程辦公越發(fā)常見,有些員工秘密兼任多份全職工作,實現(xiàn)收入翻倍甚至三倍,還不用加班?!敦敻弧凡稍L的“超負(fù)荷就業(yè)者”當(dāng)中,有人同時從事五份工作,年收入超過72.5萬美元,且每周工作時間并未超過標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的40小時。
如果你越來越奇怪有些同事在Teams上的狀態(tài)總是“離開”,或者會議上從不開攝像頭,他們可能正在做兩份工作,而且都在正常工作時間里。
上個月,某軟件工程師被曝同時在多家硅谷初創(chuàng)公司任職,一時間社交媒體上議論紛紛,多家企業(yè)開始清查內(nèi)部有沒有此類欺騙行為。
然而,同時從事不止一份工作(有時甚至多達(dá)五份)的情況,可能超過一些企業(yè)想象。畢竟,遠(yuǎn)程辦公持續(xù)盛行,雇主越發(fā)難以掌握員工的真實工作狀態(tài)。
“在美國公司工作過就知道,很多事都是表面功夫,”一位匿名受訪者告訴《財富》。他目前從事三份工作,年收入約72.5萬美元。
他們最多同時做五份工作,主要因為人工智能工具帶來的效率提升,現(xiàn)在發(fā)郵件、整理會議記錄、起草交付成果都比以前輕松得多,而且都能在相對正常的工作時間內(nèi)完成。
“現(xiàn)在感覺更像一場游戲,我想知道自己最多能同時做幾份工作還能保持理智?”他們回憶說。
事實證明,工作“飽和”確實回報豐厚。如果同時做五份工作,他們估計年收入能超過100萬美元。
“我對公司毫無忠誠可言,”他們補充道。
沒覺得搶別人的工作
《財富》還采訪了另一位員工,目前在醫(yī)療科技行業(yè)身兼兩份工作。盡管年收入接近25萬美元,他們?nèi)阅艽_保在40小時內(nèi)完成。至于在如今動蕩的就業(yè)市場中會不會搶走其他求職者的機會,他們并不擔(dān)心。
“企業(yè)要的是我的知識和專業(yè)技能,不是看我工作了多少小時,”他告訴《財富》。
同時從事多份工作下次更新簡歷時可能會引起別人注意,但他們表示,特定時間內(nèi)只會寫上“最好的那份全職工作”,這樣就不用多作解釋作。不過,醫(yī)療科技行業(yè)人才緊缺,所以這么做沒什么大問題。
“我不用找工作,是工作來找我,”他們說,“說實話,我都想不起上次主動投簡歷是什么時候。2017年開始,我已經(jīng)換了四份工作?!?/p>
他們表示,正是因為太多公司頻繁挖角,才助長了“過度就業(yè)”的行為。
雖然同時做多份工作在法律上并不違法,但獵頭公司Bentley Lewis首席執(zhí)行官劉易斯?馬萊赫等業(yè)內(nèi)人士對此并不鼓勵。
“如果做著全職工作并獲得了相應(yīng)的報酬,就不該再做別的全職工作,除非原公司明確同意,”此前馬萊赫對《財富》表示,“我認(rèn)為這么做不道德,一旦被公司發(fā)現(xiàn)后果很嚴(yán)重。如果是幾份兼職,那就另當(dāng)別論。”
趨勢或?qū)⒊掷m(xù),但不會太久
《財富》采訪的兩位從業(yè)者都是遠(yuǎn)程辦公者,不過在Reddit“過度就業(yè)”社區(qū)中,也有人聲稱在一個地方上班時偷偷做另一份工作也是可能的。不過總體而言,做多份全職工作主要還是靠遠(yuǎn)程辦公。
摩根大通(JPMorgan Chase)等《財富》美國500強公司一直呼吁員工回辦公室,然而遠(yuǎn)程辦公仍然普遍。根據(jù)美國勞工部(U.S. Department of Labor)最新的《美國時間使用調(diào)查》,2024年33%的員工居家辦公,僅比2023年的35%略有下降。
賓夕法尼亞大學(xué)(University of Pennsylvania)社會學(xué)教授杰里?雅各布斯表示,遠(yuǎn)程辦公持續(xù)的時間遠(yuǎn)超過他的預(yù)期,但現(xiàn)在老板們也在逐漸摸清員工的真實工作效率。
“遠(yuǎn)程辦公持續(xù)得越久,人們就越會當(dāng)成常規(guī)工作方式,”雅各布斯對《財富》表示,“而持續(xù)越久,管理水平也會相應(yīng)提高?!?/p>
因此,他認(rèn)為“同時做多份全職工作”不會變成長期趨勢,更像一種嘗試。
“如果在別的工作上投入大量時間和精力,很難讓本職工作的老板相信你確實在努力工作,”他補充道。
賓夕法尼亞州立大學(xué)阿賓頓分校經(jīng)濟學(xué)與勞動關(guān)系教授朗尼?戈爾登也持類似觀點,他認(rèn)為從事多份全職工作的情況可能增多,但最終發(fā)展成什么樣還有待觀察。
“問題在于,道德規(guī)范、生產(chǎn)效率以及相關(guān)規(guī)章制度能否跟上新趨勢?”(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:梁宇
審校:夏林
? 隨著遠(yuǎn)程辦公越發(fā)常見,有些員工秘密兼任多份全職工作,實現(xiàn)收入翻倍甚至三倍,還不用加班?!敦敻弧凡稍L的“超負(fù)荷就業(yè)者”當(dāng)中,有人同時從事五份工作,年收入超過72.5萬美元,且每周工作時間并未超過標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的40小時。
如果你越來越奇怪有些同事在Teams上的狀態(tài)總是“離開”,或者會議上從不開攝像頭,他們可能正在做兩份工作,而且都在正常工作時間里。
上個月,某軟件工程師被曝同時在多家硅谷初創(chuàng)公司任職,一時間社交媒體上議論紛紛,多家企業(yè)開始清查內(nèi)部有沒有此類欺騙行為。
然而,同時從事不止一份工作(有時甚至多達(dá)五份)的情況,可能超過一些企業(yè)想象。畢竟,遠(yuǎn)程辦公持續(xù)盛行,雇主越發(fā)難以掌握員工的真實工作狀態(tài)。
“在美國公司工作過就知道,很多事都是表面功夫,”一位匿名受訪者告訴《財富》。他目前從事三份工作,年收入約72.5萬美元。
他們最多同時做五份工作,主要因為人工智能工具帶來的效率提升,現(xiàn)在發(fā)郵件、整理會議記錄、起草交付成果都比以前輕松得多,而且都能在相對正常的工作時間內(nèi)完成。
“現(xiàn)在感覺更像一場游戲,我想知道自己最多能同時做幾份工作還能保持理智?”他們回憶說。
事實證明,工作“飽和”確實回報豐厚。如果同時做五份工作,他們估計年收入能超過100萬美元。
“我對公司毫無忠誠可言,”他們補充道。
沒覺得搶別人的工作
《財富》還采訪了另一位員工,目前在醫(yī)療科技行業(yè)身兼兩份工作。盡管年收入接近25萬美元,他們?nèi)阅艽_保在40小時內(nèi)完成。至于在如今動蕩的就業(yè)市場中會不會搶走其他求職者的機會,他們并不擔(dān)心。
“企業(yè)要的是我的知識和專業(yè)技能,不是看我工作了多少小時,”他告訴《財富》。
同時從事多份工作下次更新簡歷時可能會引起別人注意,但他們表示,特定時間內(nèi)只會寫上“最好的那份全職工作”,這樣就不用多作解釋作。不過,醫(yī)療科技行業(yè)人才緊缺,所以這么做沒什么大問題。
“我不用找工作,是工作來找我,”他們說,“說實話,我都想不起上次主動投簡歷是什么時候。2017年開始,我已經(jīng)換了四份工作?!?/p>
他們表示,正是因為太多公司頻繁挖角,才助長了“過度就業(yè)”的行為。
雖然同時做多份工作在法律上并不違法,但獵頭公司Bentley Lewis首席執(zhí)行官劉易斯?馬萊赫等業(yè)內(nèi)人士對此并不鼓勵。
“如果做著全職工作并獲得了相應(yīng)的報酬,就不該再做別的全職工作,除非原公司明確同意,”此前馬萊赫對《財富》表示,“我認(rèn)為這么做不道德,一旦被公司發(fā)現(xiàn)后果很嚴(yán)重。如果是幾份兼職,那就另當(dāng)別論?!?/p>
趨勢或?qū)⒊掷m(xù),但不會太久
《財富》采訪的兩位從業(yè)者都是遠(yuǎn)程辦公者,不過在Reddit“過度就業(yè)”社區(qū)中,也有人聲稱在一個地方上班時偷偷做另一份工作也是可能的。不過總體而言,做多份全職工作主要還是靠遠(yuǎn)程辦公。
摩根大通(JPMorgan Chase)等《財富》美國500強公司一直呼吁員工回辦公室,然而遠(yuǎn)程辦公仍然普遍。根據(jù)美國勞工部(U.S. Department of Labor)最新的《美國時間使用調(diào)查》,2024年33%的員工居家辦公,僅比2023年的35%略有下降。
賓夕法尼亞大學(xué)(University of Pennsylvania)社會學(xué)教授杰里?雅各布斯表示,遠(yuǎn)程辦公持續(xù)的時間遠(yuǎn)超過他的預(yù)期,但現(xiàn)在老板們也在逐漸摸清員工的真實工作效率。
“遠(yuǎn)程辦公持續(xù)得越久,人們就越會當(dāng)成常規(guī)工作方式,”雅各布斯對《財富》表示,“而持續(xù)越久,管理水平也會相應(yīng)提高。”
因此,他認(rèn)為“同時做多份全職工作”不會變成長期趨勢,更像一種嘗試。
“如果在別的工作上投入大量時間和精力,很難讓本職工作的老板相信你確實在努力工作,”他補充道。
賓夕法尼亞州立大學(xué)阿賓頓分校經(jīng)濟學(xué)與勞動關(guān)系教授朗尼?戈爾登也持類似觀點,他認(rèn)為從事多份全職工作的情況可能增多,但最終發(fā)展成什么樣還有待觀察。
“問題在于,道德規(guī)范、生產(chǎn)效率以及相關(guān)規(guī)章制度能否跟上新趨勢?”(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:梁宇
審校:夏林
? As remote work lingers, employees are doubling, even tripling, their paychecks by secretly juggling multiple full-time jobs—and not even having to pull overtime. The overemployed workers Fortune spoke to are working up to five jobs and pulling in more than $725,000 a year, all within a standard 40-hour week.
If you’ve grown suspicious of your coworker’s away status on Teams or their refusal to turn their camera on during meetings, there’s a chance they might be trying to earn two salaries at once—and fit it all into a normal workweek.
The practice went viral on social media last month when a single software engineer was found to be working at multiple Silicon Valley startups at once, prompting other companies to check whether they had fallen victim to similar deceitfulness.
However, holding down more than one gig at a time—sometimes even up to five—may be bigger than some companies expect. After all, the continued prevalence of remote work has made it more challenging for employers to know exactly what their workers are up to.
“If you’ve worked in corporate America, it is a lot of fluff and not a lot of substance,” said one worker who spoke anonymously with Fortune. They currently work three gigs, making about $725,000 altogether.
At one point, they were balancing five roles total, something they said has been made possible by AI productivity enhancement, with new tools making it easier than ever to send emails, compile meeting notes, and draft deliverables—and get it all done under relatively normal work hours.
“At this point it kind of became a game to me, how many jobs can I do at once and stay sane?” they recalled.
Maxing out on jobs certainly paid. off. While juggling five at once, they estimated bringing in more than $1 million a year.
“I have zero loyalty to a corporation,” they added.
No regrets about taking work from others
Fortune spoke to a second worker who currently holds two jobs in the healthcare technology industry. And despite being a full-time worker making a combined amount of nearly $250,000, they are able to get all the work completed within 40 hours. They don’t have concerns over taking jobs away from those struggling in today’s rocky job market.
“They’re hiring me for my knowledge and my expertise, not for hours worked,” they told Fortune.
And while holding more than one job may raise eyebrows next time you have to put your work history on a resume, they said they will just write the best full-time role they had at a current period to avoid having to answer for holding two jobs at once. However, the demand for talent in the healthcare tech industry has not made it much of an issue.
“I don’t go look for jobs, jobs come and look for me,” they said. “To be honest, I don’t remember the last time I went to apply for a job. And since 2017, I’ve had four different positions.”
In fact, they said they got so many recruitment offers from firms trying to snatch up talent, the companies practically enabled overemployment behavior.
Holding more than one job might be legal, but some people like Lewis Maleh, CEO of executive recruitment agency Bentley Lewis, don’t recommend people emulate the behavior.
“If someone is doing a full-time perm job and being paid accordingly, they should not be doing another full-time perm role unless the company is OK with it,” Maleh previously told Fortune. “I don’t think it’s ethical and will cost you down the road if you get found out. If you are doing a few part-time gigs, that’s of course a different story.”
A trend that might continue, but maybe not for long
Though both of the sources Fortune spoke with are fully-remote employees, some users on the overemployment Reddit community have deemed it possible to secretly work at a second job while on site elsewhere. But by and large, working multiple full-time jobs has been enabled by the ability to work from home.
Despite calls for workers to return to the office from large Fortune 500 companies like JPMorgan Chase, remote work is still common. In fact, 33% of all workers worked from home in 2024, down just slightly from 35% in 2023, according to the U.S. Department of Labor’s latest American Time Use Survey.
Remote work has stuck around far more than Jerry Jacobs, professor of sociology at the University of Pennsylvania, expected—but now bosses are slowly getting better at gauging workers’ productivity realities.
“The longer (remote work) lasts, the more I think people will get used to this as just being, you know, one way that people work,” Jacobs tells Fortune. “And I think the longer it lasts, the more you know, people are going to get good at managing it.”
And as a result, he doesn’t expect the trend of having multiple full-time jobs to carry on—but rather something people are experimenting with.
“It’s hard to convince people on your first job, that you’re really doing your job, if you’re spending a lot of your time and energy on your second job,” he adds.
Similarly Lonnie Golden, a professor of economics and labor–human relations at Penn State University Abington, believes working more than one full-time job has the potential to grow, but it remains to be seen what that will actually look like.
“The question is, will the ethics, the productivity, the rules and regulations catch up with this?”