
明尼阿波利斯聯(lián)邦儲(chǔ)備銀行近期一項(xiàng)研究顯示,自主創(chuàng)業(yè)雖可能帶來(lái)遠(yuǎn)超穩(wěn)定工作的收入,但多數(shù)創(chuàng)業(yè)者無(wú)法享受這一收入優(yōu)勢(shì)。
該研究通過(guò)對(duì)2000年至2015年的稅收與收入數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析后發(fā)現(xiàn):25歲創(chuàng)業(yè)者年均收入為2.7萬(wàn)美元(按2012年美元價(jià)值計(jì)算),略低于同齡受薪雇員的2.9萬(wàn)美元。
但兩類(lèi)人群的收入差距很快發(fā)生逆轉(zhuǎn):30歲時(shí),創(chuàng)業(yè)者年收入達(dá)5.5萬(wàn)美元,受薪雇員為4.5萬(wàn)美元,前者比后者高出22%。
隨著年齡增長(zhǎng),兩類(lèi)人群的平均收入差距進(jìn)一步擴(kuò)大。到55歲時(shí),自雇者收入比受薪雇員高出70%——前者年收入達(dá)13.4萬(wàn)美元,后者為7.9萬(wàn)美元。
研究還指出,創(chuàng)業(yè)者在創(chuàng)業(yè)初期通常擁有其他收入來(lái)源(受薪工作或其他業(yè)務(wù))。即便新業(yè)務(wù)尚未實(shí)現(xiàn)盈利,這些額外收入也能確保他們的整體收入保持正值。
然而,平均收入數(shù)據(jù)掩蓋了自雇群體內(nèi)部極為顯著的收入不平等狀況——這意味著“典型自雇收入并非來(lái)自普通自雇者”。該研究于7月發(fā)布,明尼阿波利斯聯(lián)邦儲(chǔ)備銀行上周在另一篇文章中重點(diǎn)提及了這一結(jié)論。
此外,自雇群體80%的收入來(lái)自年收入10萬(wàn)美元及以上的高收入者。
該研究指出:“美國(guó)國(guó)稅局(IRS)數(shù)據(jù)顯示,在樣本年份中,許多以自雇為主要收入來(lái)源的人,收入低于具有相似特征的受薪同行;但從整體情況來(lái)看,這部分低收入自雇者在總收入中的占比,遠(yuǎn)低于收入高于同行的自雇者。”該研究由安莫爾·班達(dá)里(Anmol Bhandari)、艾倫·R·麥格拉坦(Ellen R. McGrattan)、托比·卡斯(Tobey Kass)、埃文·舒爾茨(Evan Schulz)和托馬斯·J·梅(Thomas J. May)共同完成。
這一發(fā)現(xiàn)發(fā)布之際,小型企業(yè)(尤其是商業(yè)領(lǐng)域)正成為私募股權(quán)的高利潤(rùn)投資標(biāo)的。
部分私募股權(quán)公司通過(guò)投資企業(yè)、與創(chuàng)始人合作,助力企業(yè)擴(kuò)大規(guī)模、提升收益。
明尼阿波利斯聯(lián)邦儲(chǔ)備銀行研究的其他發(fā)現(xiàn)旨在消除關(guān)于自雇人士的若干誤解,例如“自雇者都是尋求工作靈活性的零工從業(yè)者、為逃避失業(yè)而創(chuàng)業(yè)的不合群者、尋求風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資的發(fā)明者、虛報(bào)收入以偷逃稅款的人”。
例如,總體而言,創(chuàng)業(yè)者在創(chuàng)業(yè)時(shí)并未獲得巨額資金支持,也未嚴(yán)重依賴(lài)債務(wù)融資。此外,數(shù)據(jù)表明,那些轉(zhuǎn)型成為自雇者的人群此前收入普遍高于受薪雇員——這與“被迫創(chuàng)業(yè)”的觀點(diǎn)形成反差。
研究指出:“多數(shù)堅(jiān)持創(chuàng)業(yè)的創(chuàng)業(yè)者收入增長(zhǎng)幅度高于受薪雇員。若能規(guī)避最嚴(yán)重的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)沖擊,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)自雇是一項(xiàng)頗具吸引力的選擇,而且從風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與回報(bào)的角度來(lái)看,自雇并不像先前認(rèn)為的那樣令人費(fèi)解。”(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
明尼阿波利斯聯(lián)邦儲(chǔ)備銀行近期一項(xiàng)研究顯示,自主創(chuàng)業(yè)雖可能帶來(lái)遠(yuǎn)超穩(wěn)定工作的收入,但多數(shù)創(chuàng)業(yè)者無(wú)法享受這一收入優(yōu)勢(shì)。
該研究通過(guò)對(duì)2000年至2015年的稅收與收入數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析后發(fā)現(xiàn):25歲創(chuàng)業(yè)者年均收入為2.7萬(wàn)美元(按2012年美元價(jià)值計(jì)算),略低于同齡受薪雇員的2.9萬(wàn)美元。
但兩類(lèi)人群的收入差距很快發(fā)生逆轉(zhuǎn):30歲時(shí),創(chuàng)業(yè)者年收入達(dá)5.5萬(wàn)美元,受薪雇員為4.5萬(wàn)美元,前者比后者高出22%。
隨著年齡增長(zhǎng),兩類(lèi)人群的平均收入差距進(jìn)一步擴(kuò)大。到55歲時(shí),自雇者收入比受薪雇員高出70%——前者年收入達(dá)13.4萬(wàn)美元,后者為7.9萬(wàn)美元。
研究還指出,創(chuàng)業(yè)者在創(chuàng)業(yè)初期通常擁有其他收入來(lái)源(受薪工作或其他業(yè)務(wù))。即便新業(yè)務(wù)尚未實(shí)現(xiàn)盈利,這些額外收入也能確保他們的整體收入保持正值。
然而,平均收入數(shù)據(jù)掩蓋了自雇群體內(nèi)部極為顯著的收入不平等狀況——這意味著“典型自雇收入并非來(lái)自普通自雇者”。該研究于7月發(fā)布,明尼阿波利斯聯(lián)邦儲(chǔ)備銀行上周在另一篇文章中重點(diǎn)提及了這一結(jié)論。
此外,自雇群體80%的收入來(lái)自年收入10萬(wàn)美元及以上的高收入者。
該研究指出:“美國(guó)國(guó)稅局(IRS)數(shù)據(jù)顯示,在樣本年份中,許多以自雇為主要收入來(lái)源的人,收入低于具有相似特征的受薪同行;但從整體情況來(lái)看,這部分低收入自雇者在總收入中的占比,遠(yuǎn)低于收入高于同行的自雇者。”該研究由安莫爾·班達(dá)里(Anmol Bhandari)、艾倫·R·麥格拉坦(Ellen R. McGrattan)、托比·卡斯(Tobey Kass)、埃文·舒爾茨(Evan Schulz)和托馬斯·J·梅(Thomas J. May)共同完成。
這一發(fā)現(xiàn)發(fā)布之際,小型企業(yè)(尤其是商業(yè)領(lǐng)域)正成為私募股權(quán)的高利潤(rùn)投資標(biāo)的。
部分私募股權(quán)公司通過(guò)投資企業(yè)、與創(chuàng)始人合作,助力企業(yè)擴(kuò)大規(guī)模、提升收益。
明尼阿波利斯聯(lián)邦儲(chǔ)備銀行研究的其他發(fā)現(xiàn)旨在消除關(guān)于自雇人士的若干誤解,例如“自雇者都是尋求工作靈活性的零工從業(yè)者、為逃避失業(yè)而創(chuàng)業(yè)的不合群者、尋求風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資的發(fā)明者、虛報(bào)收入以偷逃稅款的人”。
例如,總體而言,創(chuàng)業(yè)者在創(chuàng)業(yè)時(shí)并未獲得巨額資金支持,也未嚴(yán)重依賴(lài)債務(wù)融資。此外,數(shù)據(jù)表明,那些轉(zhuǎn)型成為自雇者的人群此前收入普遍高于受薪雇員——這與“被迫創(chuàng)業(yè)”的觀點(diǎn)形成反差。
研究指出:“多數(shù)堅(jiān)持創(chuàng)業(yè)的創(chuàng)業(yè)者收入增長(zhǎng)幅度高于受薪雇員。若能規(guī)避最嚴(yán)重的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)沖擊,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)自雇是一項(xiàng)頗具吸引力的選擇,而且從風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與回報(bào)的角度來(lái)看,自雇并不像先前認(rèn)為的那樣令人費(fèi)解。”(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
Striking out on your own can result in much more income than holding a steady job with steady pay, but many entrepreneurs won’t enjoy that premium, according to a recent study from the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
In an analysis of tax and income data from 2000 to 2015, the study found the average entrepreneur made $27,000 annually (in 2012 dollars) at age 25—slightly less than the $29,000 for a paid employee at the same age.
But those workers soon switched places, and by age 30 entrepreneurs made $55,000 versus $45,000 for paycheck workers, or 22% more.
As they got older, the average income gap between them widened, and by age 55 the self-employed made 70% more: $134,000 versus $79,000 a year.
The study also noted that entrepreneurs often have other sources of income when starting out, either from paid employment or a separate business, allowing them to post positive overall earnings even if their new businesses haven’t yet turned a profit.
But the data on average earnings also masks sharp inequality among self-employed workers, meaning that “the typical dollar in self-employment does not come from the typical self-employed individual,” according to the study, which was published in July and highlighted in a separate post from the Minneapolis Fed last week.
In addition, 80% of the income earned by the self-employed came from those making $100,000 a year or more.
“IRS data show that many of the primarily self-employed earned less over the sample years than paid-employed peers with similar characteristics, but in the aggregate this subgroup has a much lower share of the total income than those that earned more than their peers,” the study—authored by Anmol Bhandari, Ellen R. McGrattan, Tobey Kass, Evan Schulz, and Thomas J. May—said.
The findings come as small businesses, especially in trades, have emerged as lucrative opportunities for private equity.
By investing in businesses and partnering with their founders, some PE firms can help scale up companies and grow earnings.
Other findings from the Minneapolis Fed study sought to dispel some myths about the self-employed, such as being “a gig worker seeking flexible arrangements, a misfit avoiding unemployment spells, an inventor seeking venture capital, a tax dodger misreporting income.”
For example, entrepreneurs overall didn’t get a big cash windfall or rely heavily on debt to start their businesses. In addition, data showed those who switched to self-employment had previously earned more than peers who were paid employees, contrasting with notions that they were pushed into starting their own business.
“Most entrepreneurs that persist in business have higher earnings growth than in paid employment,” the study said. “With insurance from the most adverse shocks, we find that self employment is an attractive option and not puzzling from a risk versus return perspective as previously thought.”