日韩中文字幕在线一区二区三区,亚洲热视频在线观看,久久精品午夜一区二区福利,精品一区二区三区在线观看l,麻花传媒剧电影,亚洲香蕉伊综合在人在线,免费av一区二区三区在线,亚洲成在线人视频观看
          首頁 500強(qiáng) 活動(dòng) 榜單 商業(yè) 科技 商潮 專題 品牌中心
          雜志訂閱

          眾籌網(wǎng)站CEO:很多美國人開始依靠眾籌購買食品

          Ashley Lutz
          2025-10-15

          在當(dāng)前經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境下,越來越多的美國人請(qǐng)求陌生人幫助支付生活必需品費(fèi)用。

          文本設(shè)置
          小號(hào)
          默認(rèn)
          大號(hào)
          Plus(0條)

          蒂姆·卡多根。圖片來源:JP Yim/Getty Images

          GoFundMe的首席執(zhí)行官道出了一個(gè)不言而喻的事實(shí):在當(dāng)前經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境下,越來越多的美國人正通過眾籌來購買食品雜貨以維持生計(jì)。

          GoFundMe的首席執(zhí)行官蒂姆·卡多根對(duì)雅虎財(cái)經(jīng)表示,當(dāng)前美國經(jīng)濟(jì)形勢(shì)非常嚴(yán)峻,以至于越來越多的美國人正在籌錢購買食物。這個(gè)令人震驚的數(shù)據(jù)點(diǎn),揭示了家庭預(yù)算與基本需求之間的差距正在日益擴(kuò)大。

          在最近接受布萊恩·索齊的《開盤競價(jià)·無過濾》(Opening Bid Unfiltered)播客采訪時(shí),他表示為購買食品雜貨等必需品發(fā)起的籌款活動(dòng)顯著增加,這表明籌款動(dòng)機(jī)已從應(yīng)對(duì)突發(fā)緊急事件轉(zhuǎn)向滿足日常生存需求。

          卡多根表示:“在過去三年里,在我們幾乎所有市場中,基本生活必需品的價(jià)格都大幅上漲。”

          這種變化凸顯了許多美國人面臨的新經(jīng)濟(jì)現(xiàn)狀:持續(xù)的通脹、更高的借貸成本以及微薄的財(cái)務(wù)儲(chǔ)備,正迫使許多家庭區(qū)分賬單優(yōu)先級(jí)、艱難應(yīng)對(duì)債務(wù),并以新的方式尋求幫助。

          食品雜貨成為新“緊急情況”

          卡多根觀察到的現(xiàn)象,即越來越多的人請(qǐng)求陌生人幫助支付生活必需品費(fèi)用,對(duì)于這個(gè)歷來與醫(yī)療賬單、災(zāi)難救援和社區(qū)項(xiàng)目相關(guān)的平臺(tái)而言,標(biāo)志著一個(gè)發(fā)人深省的轉(zhuǎn)變。當(dāng)食品成本超出人們的支付能力,導(dǎo)致工資無法維持基本生活時(shí),眾籌就從利他主義行為演變成了一種平行的保障機(jī)制。

          在《財(cái)富》雜志此前對(duì)通脹長期影響的報(bào)道中,消費(fèi)者的應(yīng)對(duì)策略包括降級(jí)消費(fèi)、減少購物量、推遲汽車維修以及依賴信用卡。卡多根所描述的轉(zhuǎn)變表明,對(duì)于越來越多美國人,尤其是那些租房、通勤并背負(fù)浮動(dòng)利率債務(wù)的年輕人和低收入家庭而言,這些策略已經(jīng)不再奏效。

          通脹的余震

          即使整體通脹率已從峰值回落,美國家庭的預(yù)算依舊要面對(duì)高企的價(jià)格水平。《財(cái)富》雜志一直追蹤累積通脹(而不僅僅是月度數(shù)據(jù))對(duì)家庭造成的壓力。例如,食品雜貨價(jià)格比兩三年前更高,租金已達(dá)到更高水平,兒童保育費(fèi)用也使家庭收入捉襟見肘。

          工資上漲確實(shí)幫助了許多工薪階層,但這種幫助并不均衡,且往往是在生活成本增加之后工資才會(huì)上漲。對(duì)于沒有儲(chǔ)蓄緩沖的家庭而言,更高的成本基數(shù)才是問題的核心所在。這一背景解釋了為何GoFundMe上食品雜貨籌款活動(dòng)的增多并非奇聞,而是當(dāng)前經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況的晴雨表。

          餐桌旁的信貸緊縮

          家庭資產(chǎn)負(fù)債表受到必需品價(jià)格居高不下以及信用卡和汽車貸款借款成本上升的雙重打擊。《財(cái)富》雜志的報(bào)道曾強(qiáng)調(diào),年輕借款人的拖欠率正在上升,長期暫停后恢復(fù)償還學(xué)生貸款給年輕人帶來巨大壓力。對(duì)一些人來說,來自朋友、社區(qū)團(tuán)體和在線捐助者的“社會(huì)資本”現(xiàn)在已經(jīng)取代了“金融資本”。在一個(gè)工資、福利和公共支持尚未完全彌補(bǔ)缺口的體系中,通過眾籌購買食品雜貨成了一種“最后一公里”的解決方案。

          財(cái)富大轉(zhuǎn)移遭遇捐贈(zèng)停滯期

          卡多根也將此刻視為一個(gè)機(jī)遇:隨著嬰兒潮一代將數(shù)萬億美元財(cái)富轉(zhuǎn)移給繼承人和慈善事業(yè),美國正進(jìn)入一場歷史性的財(cái)富大轉(zhuǎn)移。然而,整體慈善捐贈(zèng)占GDP的比重一直難以持續(xù)突破約2%的水平。核心挑戰(zhàn)在于如何將私人的資產(chǎn)負(fù)債表實(shí)力轉(zhuǎn)化為大規(guī)模的公眾慷慨行為。《財(cái)富》雜志曾探討過一種矛盾狀態(tài):由股票、房地產(chǎn)和私人投資推動(dòng)的強(qiáng)勁資產(chǎn)市場,與普遍存在的財(cái)務(wù)不安全感并存。這場財(cái)富轉(zhuǎn)移可能會(huì)放大或者縮小這種分歧,這取決于繼承者和在世捐贈(zèng)者是否致力于進(jìn)行更具活力、基于實(shí)際需求的捐贈(zèng)。

          Z世代、千禧一代與新的捐贈(zèng)理念

          GoFundMe的首席執(zhí)行官希望,那些通常更注重價(jià)值觀、熟悉數(shù)字技術(shù)且具有社區(qū)導(dǎo)向的年輕捐贈(zèng)者,能夠推動(dòng)捐贈(zèng)額更大幅度、更快速的增長。

          這些群體已經(jīng)在推動(dòng)互助網(wǎng)絡(luò)和在線小額捐贈(zèng)活動(dòng);問題在于,這種自發(fā)的互助精神能否從一次性籌款活動(dòng),擴(kuò)展到對(duì)食物安全、住房穩(wěn)定和本地服務(wù)的持續(xù)支持。

          如果雇主配捐、捐贈(zèng)者建議基金和專項(xiàng)基金的使用能更加便捷,并且始終保持較高的透明度和即時(shí)性,那么小額捐贈(zèng)可能會(huì)積少成多,產(chǎn)生顯著的宏觀效應(yīng)。

          前路何方

          許多美國人仍然可能因一次意外沖擊而開始拖欠債務(wù)。越來越多人在GoFundMe平臺(tái)上為食品雜貨發(fā)起眾籌活動(dòng)體現(xiàn)了這種趨勢(shì),并對(duì)即將做出遺產(chǎn)決策的財(cái)富持有者提出了挑戰(zhàn)。

          如果說財(cái)富轉(zhuǎn)移是這十年的經(jīng)濟(jì)主題,那么在道德層面與之相對(duì)應(yīng)的一個(gè)理念就是“慷慨捐贈(zèng)”。捐贈(zèng)行為能否顯著突破其長期在經(jīng)濟(jì)中所占的份額,將取決于能否將當(dāng)下的同理心轉(zhuǎn)化為未來的基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè),從而讓人們無需為了保證溫飽而四處募捐。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

          《財(cái)富》雜志使用生成式AI輔助完成本文的初稿。編輯在發(fā)表前已核實(shí)信息的準(zhǔn)確性。

          譯者:劉進(jìn)龍

          審校:汪皓

          GoFundMe的首席執(zhí)行官道出了一個(gè)不言而喻的事實(shí):在當(dāng)前經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境下,越來越多的美國人正通過眾籌來購買食品雜貨以維持生計(jì)。

          GoFundMe的首席執(zhí)行官蒂姆·卡多根對(duì)雅虎財(cái)經(jīng)表示,當(dāng)前美國經(jīng)濟(jì)形勢(shì)非常嚴(yán)峻,以至于越來越多的美國人正在籌錢購買食物。這個(gè)令人震驚的數(shù)據(jù)點(diǎn),揭示了家庭預(yù)算與基本需求之間的差距正在日益擴(kuò)大。

          在最近接受布萊恩·索齊的《開盤競價(jià)·無過濾》(Opening Bid Unfiltered)播客采訪時(shí),他表示為購買食品雜貨等必需品發(fā)起的籌款活動(dòng)顯著增加,這表明籌款動(dòng)機(jī)已從應(yīng)對(duì)突發(fā)緊急事件轉(zhuǎn)向滿足日常生存需求。

          卡多根表示:“在過去三年里,在我們幾乎所有市場中,基本生活必需品的價(jià)格都大幅上漲。”

          這種變化凸顯了許多美國人面臨的新經(jīng)濟(jì)現(xiàn)狀:持續(xù)的通脹、更高的借貸成本以及微薄的財(cái)務(wù)儲(chǔ)備,正迫使許多家庭區(qū)分賬單優(yōu)先級(jí)、艱難應(yīng)對(duì)債務(wù),并以新的方式尋求幫助。

          食品雜貨成為新“緊急情況”

          卡多根觀察到的現(xiàn)象,即越來越多的人請(qǐng)求陌生人幫助支付生活必需品費(fèi)用,對(duì)于這個(gè)歷來與醫(yī)療賬單、災(zāi)難救援和社區(qū)項(xiàng)目相關(guān)的平臺(tái)而言,標(biāo)志著一個(gè)發(fā)人深省的轉(zhuǎn)變。當(dāng)食品成本超出人們的支付能力,導(dǎo)致工資無法維持基本生活時(shí),眾籌就從利他主義行為演變成了一種平行的保障機(jī)制。

          在《財(cái)富》雜志此前對(duì)通脹長期影響的報(bào)道中,消費(fèi)者的應(yīng)對(duì)策略包括降級(jí)消費(fèi)、減少購物量、推遲汽車維修以及依賴信用卡。卡多根所描述的轉(zhuǎn)變表明,對(duì)于越來越多美國人,尤其是那些租房、通勤并背負(fù)浮動(dòng)利率債務(wù)的年輕人和低收入家庭而言,這些策略已經(jīng)不再奏效。

          通脹的余震

          即使整體通脹率已從峰值回落,美國家庭的預(yù)算依舊要面對(duì)高企的價(jià)格水平。《財(cái)富》雜志一直追蹤累積通脹(而不僅僅是月度數(shù)據(jù))對(duì)家庭造成的壓力。例如,食品雜貨價(jià)格比兩三年前更高,租金已達(dá)到更高水平,兒童保育費(fèi)用也使家庭收入捉襟見肘。

          工資上漲確實(shí)幫助了許多工薪階層,但這種幫助并不均衡,且往往是在生活成本增加之后工資才會(huì)上漲。對(duì)于沒有儲(chǔ)蓄緩沖的家庭而言,更高的成本基數(shù)才是問題的核心所在。這一背景解釋了為何GoFundMe上食品雜貨籌款活動(dòng)的增多并非奇聞,而是當(dāng)前經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況的晴雨表。

          餐桌旁的信貸緊縮

          家庭資產(chǎn)負(fù)債表受到必需品價(jià)格居高不下以及信用卡和汽車貸款借款成本上升的雙重打擊。《財(cái)富》雜志的報(bào)道曾強(qiáng)調(diào),年輕借款人的拖欠率正在上升,長期暫停后恢復(fù)償還學(xué)生貸款給年輕人帶來巨大壓力。對(duì)一些人來說,來自朋友、社區(qū)團(tuán)體和在線捐助者的“社會(huì)資本”現(xiàn)在已經(jīng)取代了“金融資本”。在一個(gè)工資、福利和公共支持尚未完全彌補(bǔ)缺口的體系中,通過眾籌購買食品雜貨成了一種“最后一公里”的解決方案。

          財(cái)富大轉(zhuǎn)移遭遇捐贈(zèng)停滯期

          卡多根也將此刻視為一個(gè)機(jī)遇:隨著嬰兒潮一代將數(shù)萬億美元財(cái)富轉(zhuǎn)移給繼承人和慈善事業(yè),美國正進(jìn)入一場歷史性的財(cái)富大轉(zhuǎn)移。然而,整體慈善捐贈(zèng)占GDP的比重一直難以持續(xù)突破約2%的水平。核心挑戰(zhàn)在于如何將私人的資產(chǎn)負(fù)債表實(shí)力轉(zhuǎn)化為大規(guī)模的公眾慷慨行為。《財(cái)富》雜志曾探討過一種矛盾狀態(tài):由股票、房地產(chǎn)和私人投資推動(dòng)的強(qiáng)勁資產(chǎn)市場,與普遍存在的財(cái)務(wù)不安全感并存。這場財(cái)富轉(zhuǎn)移可能會(huì)放大或者縮小這種分歧,這取決于繼承者和在世捐贈(zèng)者是否致力于進(jìn)行更具活力、基于實(shí)際需求的捐贈(zèng)。

          Z世代、千禧一代與新的捐贈(zèng)理念

          GoFundMe的首席執(zhí)行官希望,那些通常更注重價(jià)值觀、熟悉數(shù)字技術(shù)且具有社區(qū)導(dǎo)向的年輕捐贈(zèng)者,能夠推動(dòng)捐贈(zèng)額更大幅度、更快速的增長。

          這些群體已經(jīng)在推動(dòng)互助網(wǎng)絡(luò)和在線小額捐贈(zèng)活動(dòng);問題在于,這種自發(fā)的互助精神能否從一次性籌款活動(dòng),擴(kuò)展到對(duì)食物安全、住房穩(wěn)定和本地服務(wù)的持續(xù)支持。

          如果雇主配捐、捐贈(zèng)者建議基金和專項(xiàng)基金的使用能更加便捷,并且始終保持較高的透明度和即時(shí)性,那么小額捐贈(zèng)可能會(huì)積少成多,產(chǎn)生顯著的宏觀效應(yīng)。

          前路何方

          許多美國人仍然可能因一次意外沖擊而開始拖欠債務(wù)。越來越多人在GoFundMe平臺(tái)上為食品雜貨發(fā)起眾籌活動(dòng)體現(xiàn)了這種趨勢(shì),并對(duì)即將做出遺產(chǎn)決策的財(cái)富持有者提出了挑戰(zhàn)。

          如果說財(cái)富轉(zhuǎn)移是這十年的經(jīng)濟(jì)主題,那么在道德層面與之相對(duì)應(yīng)的一個(gè)理念就是“慷慨捐贈(zèng)”。捐贈(zèng)行為能否顯著突破其長期在經(jīng)濟(jì)中所占的份額,將取決于能否將當(dāng)下的同理心轉(zhuǎn)化為未來的基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè),從而讓人們無需為了保證溫飽而四處募捐。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

          《財(cái)富》雜志使用生成式AI輔助完成本文的初稿。編輯在發(fā)表前已核實(shí)信息的準(zhǔn)確性。

          譯者:劉進(jìn)龍

          審校:汪皓

          GoFundMe’s CEO just said the quiet part out loud: in this economy, more Americans are crowdfunding groceries to get by.

          The head of GoFundMe, Tim Cadogan, told Yahoo! Finance the economy is so challenged that more Americans are raising money to buy food—an arresting data point that captures the widening gap between household budgets and basic needs.

          In a recent interview on the Opening Bid Unfiltered podcast with Brian Sozzi, he described a notable rise in campaigns for essentials like groceries, a shift from one-off emergencies toward everyday survival.

          “Basic things you need to get through life [have] gone up significantly in the last three years in practically all our markets,” Cadogan said.

          That evolution underscores the new economic reality for many Americans: persistent inflation, higher borrowing costs, and thin financial cushions are forcing many households to triage bills, juggle debt, and seek help in new ways.

          Groceries as the new emergency

          Cadogan’s observation—that more people are asking strangers to help pay for staples—marks a sobering turn for a platform historically associated with medical bills, disaster relief, and community projects. When the cost of food stretches paychecks past the breaking point, crowdfunding morphs from altruism to a parallel safety net.

          In previous Fortune coverage of inflation’s long tail, consumers’ coping tactics have included trading down brands, shrinking baskets, delaying car repairs, and leaning on credit cards. The shift Cadogan describes suggests those tactics have run out of runway for a growing slice of the country, especially younger and lower-income households who rent, commute, and carry variable-rate debt.

          The inflation aftershock

          Even as headline inflation cools from its peak, elevated price levels remain embedded in household budgets. Fortune has tracked how cumulative inflation, not just the monthly prints, weighs on families. For instance, groceries cost more than they did two or three years ago, rents have reset higher, and child care is straining paychecks.

          Wage gains helped many workers, but unevenly and often after costs had already jumped. For families without savings buffers, a higher cost baseline is the real story. That backdrop explains why an uptick in grocery campaigns on GoFundMe isn’t a curiosity—it’s a barometer of the current economy.

          The credit crunch at the kitchen table

          Household balance sheets have been whipsawed by stubbornly high prices on necessities as well as steeper borrowing costs on credit cards and auto loans. Fortune’s reporting has highlighted rising delinquency rates among younger borrowers and the squeeze from student loan repayments resuming after a long pause. For some, the social capital of friends, community groups, and online donors now substitutes for financial capital. Crowdfunding groceries is a last-mile solution in a system where wages, benefits, and public supports haven’t fully bridged the gap.

          The Great Wealth Transfer meets a giving plateau

          Cadogan also frames this moment as an opportunity: the U.S. is entering a historic wealth transfer as baby boomers pass tens of trillions to heirs and philanthropy. Yet overall charitable giving as a share of GDP has struggled to break out sustainably above roughly 2%. A central challenge is converting private balance-sheet strength into public generosity at scale. Fortune has explored the paradox of robust asset markets—fueled by equities, real estate, and private investments—coexisting with widespread financial insecurity. The wealth transfer could amplify that divergence or narrow it, depending on whether inheritors and living donors commit to more dynamic, needs-based giving.

          Gen Z, millennials, and a new donor thesis

          The GoFundMe CEO hopes younger donors, who are often more values-driven, digitally native, and community-oriented, will push giving higher and faster.

          These cohorts already power mutual aid networks and micro-giving online; the question is whether that instinct can scale beyond one-off campaigns to sustained support for food security, housing stability, and local services.

          If employer matching, donor-advised vehicles, and purpose-built funds become easier to use—and if transparency and immediacy remain high—small-dollar giving could compound into a measurable macro effect.

          What comes next

          Many Americans remain one shock away from going into arrears. More GoFundMe campaigns for groceries fits that narrative and raises a challenge to wealth holders on the cusp of inheritance decisions.

          If the wealth transfer is the economic story of the decade, the generosity transfer might be its moral counterpart. Whether giving can rise meaningfully above its long-running share of the economy will hinge on channeling today’s empathy into tomorrow’s infrastructure, so that no one needs to pass the hat to put food on the table.

          For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing.

          財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)所刊載內(nèi)容之知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)為財(cái)富媒體知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)有限公司及/或相關(guān)權(quán)利人專屬所有或持有。未經(jīng)許可,禁止進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)載、摘編、復(fù)制及建立鏡像等任何使用。
          0條Plus
          精彩評(píng)論
          評(píng)論

          撰寫或查看更多評(píng)論

          請(qǐng)打開財(cái)富Plus APP

          前往打開