
一些員工會進行“咖啡打卡”(coffee badging),甚至在遠程工作時晃動鼠標來顯得忙碌。但即使他們在工作中效率很高,也有一些任務可能被認為是“假性”工作——至少根據Slack聯合創始人兼前首席執行官斯圖爾特·巴特菲爾德的說法是如此。
“我的核心理論是:‘高仿真工作行為’(Hyper-realistic worklike activities)與另一個稱為‘已知有價值工作’(known valuable work)的概念相伴相生,”巴特菲爾德最近在Lenny's Podcast播客節目中說道。“高仿真工作行為表面上與工作完全相同……但這實際上是一點假性工作,而且非常微妙。”
巴特菲爾德提出了這兩個概念,他目睹了將初創公司發展壯大所需經歷的工作類型。這位連續創業者于2002年聯合創立了照片分享平臺Flickr,并擔任其首席執行官數年,隨后于2009年進行下一次創業,建立并領導了估值265億美元的巨頭Slack。自2023年1月從該公司卸任以來,巴特菲爾德一直保持低調。
憑借他數十年的商界經驗,他將勞動力生產力分為兩個不同的陣營:高仿真工作行為(他認為是“假性”工作)和已知有價值工作(能促進創新并鞏固成功)。
當初創公司發展為大型企業時,“假性”工作如何出現
作為兩次創業的創始人,巴特菲爾德目睹了“假性”工作問題往往源于企業的早期階段。一開始,員工只是試圖讓公司起步:開設銀行賬戶、創建用戶表、給密碼加鹽(salting passwords),以及完成所有對品牌基礎建設“絕對”必要的具體事務性工作。根據巴特菲爾德的看法,這些早期任務創造了“幾乎無限的生成價值”,因為它們是讓企業啟動和運行所必需的。但一旦公司成長起來,這種價值創造就會改變。
“幾乎每個組織的問題在于,一開始,你有大量的工作,你知道該怎么做,而且你知道這些工作會很有價值,”巴特菲爾德解釋說。“每個人早上開始工作時都會想,'我有10件事要做,每一件都是我知道怎么做的事,而且肯定有價值。'”
“時間流逝,待完成工作的供應與完成工作的需求之間的關系就開始發生變化。”
這位Slack前首席執行官解釋說,隨著時間的推移,會雇傭越來越多的人。最終,那些員工希望有更多的初級人才來幫助支持他們的團隊,突然間,企業有了許多準備好工作的員工,而所有“簡單、明顯的事情”都已經做完了。
但如果雇主有許多沒有足夠清晰、高價值工作期望的員工,那么員工可能會把時間花在那些高仿真工作行為上。巴特菲爾德澄清說,這不是因為員工“愚蠢”或“邪惡”,而只是因為他們希望自己履行的職責得到認可。如果老板對已知有價值工作不透明,那么員工就會試圖在團隊現狀中表現出色。
員工和首席執行官甚至不知道自己正在做“假性”工作
高仿真工作行為并不總是公然低效的。事實上,巴特菲爾德說,“假性”工作常常表現得像典型的工作任務。
“人們召集同事開會,預覽他們要在重要會議上展示的幻燈片,就是否應該改進某些幻燈片獲取反饋,”巴特菲爾德解釋道。“我們坐在會議室里,有東西投影在上面,我們都在討論它,而這正是工作的樣子。”
這位Slack聯合創始人指出,這種“假性”工作非常難以察覺——即使最高層領導也會成為這種習慣的受害者。
“我會這么做,我們的董事會成員會這么做,每位高管都會這么做,”巴特菲爾德承認。“你離掌握所有聯系人、所有信息和決策權越遠,就越容易陷入這些事情中,人們就會進行大量的高仿真工作行為,并且完全不知道這就是他們正在做的事情。”
然而,根據巴特菲爾德的說法,確保所有員工——從入門級員工一直到高級管理人員——都在做已知有價值工作的責任落在高層老板身上。首席執行官、經理、董事和高管需要明確他們的期望以及如何有意義地推動業務向前發展。巴特菲爾德建議這些領導者要明確已知有價值工作,這樣每個人都明白這就是他們應該做的事情。
“確保優先事項足夠明確,并事先明確地對某些事情說'不',這實際上是你的責任,而不是說些'嘿,你們是一群白癡,把時間浪費在這件無關緊要的事情上'這樣的話,”巴特菲爾德說。(財富中文網)
譯者:梁宇
審校:夏林
一些員工會進行“咖啡打卡”(coffee badging),甚至在遠程工作時晃動鼠標來顯得忙碌。但即使他們在工作中效率很高,也有一些任務可能被認為是“假性”工作——至少根據Slack聯合創始人兼前首席執行官斯圖爾特·巴特菲爾德的說法是如此。
“我的核心理論是:‘高仿真工作行為’(Hyper-realistic worklike activities)與另一個稱為‘已知有價值工作’(known valuable work)的概念相伴相生,”巴特菲爾德最近在Lenny's Podcast播客節目中說道。“高仿真工作行為表面上與工作完全相同……但這實際上是一點假性工作,而且非常微妙。”
巴特菲爾德提出了這兩個概念,他目睹了將初創公司發展壯大所需經歷的工作類型。這位連續創業者于2002年聯合創立了照片分享平臺Flickr,并擔任其首席執行官數年,隨后于2009年進行下一次創業,建立并領導了估值265億美元的巨頭Slack。自2023年1月從該公司卸任以來,巴特菲爾德一直保持低調。
憑借他數十年的商界經驗,他將勞動力生產力分為兩個不同的陣營:高仿真工作行為(他認為是“假性”工作)和已知有價值工作(能促進創新并鞏固成功)。
當初創公司發展為大型企業時,“假性”工作如何出現
作為兩次創業的創始人,巴特菲爾德目睹了“假性”工作問題往往源于企業的早期階段。一開始,員工只是試圖讓公司起步:開設銀行賬戶、創建用戶表、給密碼加鹽(salting passwords),以及完成所有對品牌基礎建設“絕對”必要的具體事務性工作。根據巴特菲爾德的看法,這些早期任務創造了“幾乎無限的生成價值”,因為它們是讓企業啟動和運行所必需的。但一旦公司成長起來,這種價值創造就會改變。
“幾乎每個組織的問題在于,一開始,你有大量的工作,你知道該怎么做,而且你知道這些工作會很有價值,”巴特菲爾德解釋說。“每個人早上開始工作時都會想,'我有10件事要做,每一件都是我知道怎么做的事,而且肯定有價值。'”
“時間流逝,待完成工作的供應與完成工作的需求之間的關系就開始發生變化。”
這位Slack前首席執行官解釋說,隨著時間的推移,會雇傭越來越多的人。最終,那些員工希望有更多的初級人才來幫助支持他們的團隊,突然間,企業有了許多準備好工作的員工,而所有“簡單、明顯的事情”都已經做完了。
但如果雇主有許多沒有足夠清晰、高價值工作期望的員工,那么員工可能會把時間花在那些高仿真工作行為上。巴特菲爾德澄清說,這不是因為員工“愚蠢”或“邪惡”,而只是因為他們希望自己履行的職責得到認可。如果老板對已知有價值工作不透明,那么員工就會試圖在團隊現狀中表現出色。
員工和首席執行官甚至不知道自己正在做“假性”工作
高仿真工作行為并不總是公然低效的。事實上,巴特菲爾德說,“假性”工作常常表現得像典型的工作任務。
“人們召集同事開會,預覽他們要在重要會議上展示的幻燈片,就是否應該改進某些幻燈片獲取反饋,”巴特菲爾德解釋道。“我們坐在會議室里,有東西投影在上面,我們都在討論它,而這正是工作的樣子。”
這位Slack聯合創始人指出,這種“假性”工作非常難以察覺——即使最高層領導也會成為這種習慣的受害者。
“我會這么做,我們的董事會成員會這么做,每位高管都會這么做,”巴特菲爾德承認。“你離掌握所有聯系人、所有信息和決策權越遠,就越容易陷入這些事情中,人們就會進行大量的高仿真工作行為,并且完全不知道這就是他們正在做的事情。”
然而,根據巴特菲爾德的說法,確保所有員工——從入門級員工一直到高級管理人員——都在做已知有價值工作的責任落在高層老板身上。首席執行官、經理、董事和高管需要明確他們的期望以及如何有意義地推動業務向前發展。巴特菲爾德建議這些領導者要明確已知有價值工作,這樣每個人都明白這就是他們應該做的事情。
“確保優先事項足夠明確,并事先明確地對某些事情說'不',這實際上是你的責任,而不是說些'嘿,你們是一群白癡,把時間浪費在這件無關緊要的事情上'這樣的話,”巴特菲爾德說。(財富中文網)
譯者:梁宇
審校:夏林
Some employees are guilty?of coffee badging, or even?jiggling their mouses?to look active while working remotely. But even when they're being productive on the job, there are a few tasks that could be considered “fake” work---at least according to?Slack?cofounder and former CEO?Stewart Butterfield.
“Here's my grand theory: Hyper-realistic worklike activities goes along with this other concept called known valuable work to do,” Butterfield?recently said?on?Lenny's Podcast.?“Hyper-realistic worklike activity is superficially identical to work...But this is actually a fake bit of work, and it's so subtle.”
Butterfield coined these two concepts, having seen the type of work that goes into scaling startups into big businesses. The serial entrepreneur cofounded photo-sharing platform?Flickr?in 2002, serving as its CEO for several years, before his next venture establishing and leading $26.5 billion giant Slack back in 2009. Butterfield has been keeping a low profile since he stepped down from the company in January 2023.
From his decades of experience in the business world, he's separated workforce productivity into two separate camps: hyper-realistic worklike activities, which he deems as “fake” work, and known valuable work, which promotes innovation and strengthens success.
How “fake” work appears as startups scale into big businesses
As a two-time startup founder, Butterfield witnessed that the problem with “fake” work often stems from the early years of business. At the start, employees are just trying to get the company off the ground: opening a bank account, creating a users table, salting passwords, and doing all the nuts-and-bolts type of work that is “absolutely” necessary to the brand's foundation. Those early tasks create “almost infinite generative value,” according to Butterfield, since they're required to get a business up and running. But once a company grows, that value creation changes.
“The problem with almost every organization [is] at the very beginning, you have an enormous amount of work that you know what to do, and you know that it's going to be valuable,” Butterfield explained.“Everyone's going to work in the morning like, 'I have 10 things to do and every single one of them is like something I know how to do, and it's definitely going to be valuable.'”
“Time goes on, and the relationship between the supply of work to do and the demand for doing work just starts to change.”
The former Slack CEO explained that over time, more and more people get hired. Eventually, those employees want more junior-level talent to help support their teams, and suddenly, businesses have many staffers ready to work, with all “easy, obvious stuff” having been done already.
But if an employer has many workers who do not have enough clear, high-value job expectations, then staffers may spend their time doing those hyper-realistic worklike activities. Butterfield clarified that it's not because employees are “stupid” or “evil,” but only because they want to be recognized for the duties they perform. And if bosses aren't being transparent about known valuable work to do, then staffers will try to excel within the status quo of their teams.
Workers and CEOs don't even know they're doing “fake” work
Hyper-realistic worklike activities aren't always blatantly unproductive. In fact, Butterfield said that “fake” work often comes across as typical job tasks.
“People are calling meetings with their colleagues to preview the deck that they're going to show in the big meeting, to get feedback on whether they should improve some of the slides,” Butterfield explained. “We are sitting in a conference room, and there's something being projected up there, and we're all talking about it, and that's exactly what work is.”
The Slack cofounder noted that this type of “fake” work is very subtle to pick up on---and even the most senior leadership will fall victim to the habit.
“I'll do it, our board members will do it, every exec will do it,” Butterfield admitted. “The further you are from having all of the contacts, and all the information, and the decision-making authority, the easier it is to get trapped in that stuff, and people will just perform enormous amounts of hyper-realistic worklike activities, and have no idea that that's what they're doing.”
However, the onus for ensuring that all workers are doing known valuable work---from the entry-level, all the way up to senior executives---falls on top bosses, according to Butterfield. CEOs, managers, directors, and executives need to be transparent about their expectations and how to meaningfully drive the business forward. Butterfield advised that these leaders create clarity around known valuable work, so everyone understands that's what they're supposed to be doing.
“It's actually your responsibility to make sure that there's sufficient clarity around what the priorities are, and explicitly saying 'no' to things upfront, rather than words like, 'Hey you guys are a bunch of idiots wasting your time on this thing that doesn't matter,'” Butterfield said.