
美國銀行(Bank of America)全球研究部發布報告稱,全球媒體行業都在“歷史性變革”邊緣,而華納兄弟探索公司(WBD)處于資產估值與競爭策略重大轉變的“風暴中心”。隨著華納兄弟探索公司成為激烈整合的焦點,至少三大競購方加入了戰局,包括派拉蒙天舞(Paramount Skydance)、Netflix和康卡斯特(Comcast)。美國銀行認為,這場競購戰將導致“行業格局重塑”。
華納兄弟探索公司的未來存在多種可能性,包括被派拉蒙天舞整體收購,或與康卡斯特結構性整合,不過美國銀行特別強調Netflix具有獨特戰略優勢。報告指出,Netflix若收購成功有望實現 “一石三鳥”,在曾經被稱為 “流媒體大戰” 的競爭中,華納兄弟探索公司正是最新的必爭資產。
皇冠上的明珠:華納兄弟影業
針對華納兄弟探索公司的激烈角逐,很大程度上源于其核心資產即華納兄弟影業具有的稀缺性溢價。美國銀行表示,華納兄弟探索公司擁有世界上最具價值的內容庫之一,其知識產權(IP)庫涵蓋從《哈利·波特》到DC漫畫再到《權力的游戲》等經典內容,堪稱“皇冠明珠”級資產。資深媒體娛樂分析師杰西卡?賴夫?埃利希領銜的美銀分析師估算,華納兄弟探索公司的整體收購價值約為每股30美元(截至發稿時,其股價略高于24美元。)
據報道,Netflix關注點明確集中在華納兄弟探索公司的電影和流媒體資產上,交易估值可能超過700億美元。對Netflix而言,這意味著其戰略將從打造原創IP轉向收購成熟的“IP護城河”。Netflix的流媒體用戶數無可爭議地遙遙領先,但長期以來在可用于主題公園、游戲、周邊商品和百老匯演出等多元場景的優質IP庫方面,一直落后于其他媒體公司。
美國銀行指出,打造像《哈利·波特》的系列“需要大量時間和投資”,而直接購買能立刻投產,風險低,還能通過潛在的重啟、前傳或其他系列擴展帶來顯著的增長空間。
“在多個IP領域,華納兄弟提供了Netflix在較短時間內無法通過自身增長復刻的深度,”美國銀行寫道,更重要的是,鑒于這些IP將補齊Netflix的武器庫,將對公司所各大競爭對手造成致命打擊。“如果Netflix收購華納兄弟,流媒體戰爭基本結束,”埃利希的團隊寫道。以下是如果Netflix動用資金大炮瞄準華納兄弟探索公司,“三鳥”將如何落地。
一石三鳥:鞏固權力
Netflix收購將打下的第一個“鳥”是華納兄弟探索公司本身,因為其流媒體和影業資產將消失,被納入占主導地位的流媒體平臺。
“Netflix將成為好萊塢無可爭議的全球巨頭,甚至超越目前的領先地位,”根據美國銀行的說法,公司掌握的 “內容護城河” 任何獨立流媒體平臺都無法企及,合并后的業務將占據美國流媒體市場逾五分之一份額。

目前,尼爾森數據顯示Netflix約占電視總流媒體觀看時間的18%,HBO Max(華納兄弟探索公司旗下)占3%。合并后的實體將遠超其他競爭對手,如迪士尼(11%)和亞馬遜Prime Video(8%)。只有YouTube(28%)能保持更高市場份額,而很多人認為YouTube才是Netflix真正的對手。
美國銀行還預測,Netflix將繼續通過院線發行華納兄弟的影片,多年來對這家流媒體巨頭來說一直是爭議話題。聯合首席執行官泰德?薩蘭多斯因拒絕配合影片大范圍院線發行,長期跟影院運營商關系緊張,有時甚至劍拔弩張。Netflix在紐約(巴黎劇院)和洛杉磯(埃及劇院)收購了一些精品影院,放映有望沖擊奧斯卡的優質電影,但并不廣泛發行。該策略第一個重大突破可能是格蕾塔?葛韋格即將上映的《納尼亞》改編作品,但薩蘭多斯堅稱該片僅發行IMAX版,這是Netflix首次涉足體育節目,即圣誕節NFL比賽時采用的活動化商業模式。新聞平臺Puck上頗具影響力的馬特?貝洛尼等行業觀察人士質疑,《納尼亞》會不會成為轉折點,而收購華納兄弟探索公司無疑將在這條路上走得更遠。
其他效果
第二和第三只“鳥”直接關乎Netflix的競爭對手。報告指出,對中型傳統媒體/公司來說,很難比得上Netflix的單位經濟效益,也無力抗衡亞馬遜等科技巨頭的生態。Netflix收購華納兄弟探索公司將威脅到派拉蒙天舞和NBC環球(NBCUniversal)“生死存亡”,Netflix強大的防御壁壘也會更加堅不可摧。
通過收購華納兄弟探索公司的工作室和流媒體資產,Netflix將嚴重阻礙派拉蒙+和Peacock全球擴張的雄心。美國銀行團隊特別指出,康卡斯特正處于“關鍵時刻”,因為公司正準備將日益衰退的有線電視網絡分拆為名叫Versant的公司(華納兄弟探索公司也想采用類似戰略),同時其流媒體平臺在美國缺乏規模,在美國境外又不可用。
美國銀行團隊并未探討反壟斷或其他可能影響收購的因素。據悉,近一年來派拉蒙一心想收購華納兄弟探索公司,其控股股東的埃里森家族與白宮關系密切,甲骨文創始人拉里?埃里森作為全球頂級富豪也是人工智能和科技領域的重要力量。埃里森曾與魯珀特?默多克、邁克爾?戴爾等人一起,參與控制TikTok美國業務。如今他的兒子大衛?埃里森執掌派拉蒙,近期任命Free Press的巴里?韋斯擔任主編以重整重塑CBS新聞。如果派拉蒙能將華納兄弟探索公司這顆明珠收入囊中,發展前景將大不一樣。(財富中文網)
譯者:梁宇
審校:夏林
美國銀行(Bank of America)全球研究部發布報告稱,全球媒體行業都在“歷史性變革”邊緣,而華納兄弟探索公司(WBD)處于資產估值與競爭策略重大轉變的“風暴中心”。隨著華納兄弟探索公司成為激烈整合的焦點,至少三大競購方加入了戰局,包括派拉蒙天舞(Paramount Skydance)、Netflix和康卡斯特(Comcast)。美國銀行認為,這場競購戰將導致“行業格局重塑”。
華納兄弟探索公司的未來存在多種可能性,包括被派拉蒙天舞整體收購,或與康卡斯特結構性整合,不過美國銀行特別強調Netflix具有獨特戰略優勢。報告指出,Netflix若收購成功有望實現 “一石三鳥”,在曾經被稱為 “流媒體大戰” 的競爭中,華納兄弟探索公司正是最新的必爭資產。
皇冠上的明珠:華納兄弟影業
針對華納兄弟探索公司的激烈角逐,很大程度上源于其核心資產即華納兄弟影業具有的稀缺性溢價。美國銀行表示,華納兄弟探索公司擁有世界上最具價值的內容庫之一,其知識產權(IP)庫涵蓋從《哈利·波特》到DC漫畫再到《權力的游戲》等經典內容,堪稱“皇冠明珠”級資產。資深媒體娛樂分析師杰西卡?賴夫?埃利希領銜的美銀分析師估算,華納兄弟探索公司的整體收購價值約為每股30美元(截至發稿時,其股價略高于24美元。)
據報道,Netflix關注點明確集中在華納兄弟探索公司的電影和流媒體資產上,交易估值可能超過700億美元。對Netflix而言,這意味著其戰略將從打造原創IP轉向收購成熟的“IP護城河”。Netflix的流媒體用戶數無可爭議地遙遙領先,但長期以來在可用于主題公園、游戲、周邊商品和百老匯演出等多元場景的優質IP庫方面,一直落后于其他媒體公司。
美國銀行指出,打造像《哈利·波特》的系列“需要大量時間和投資”,而直接購買能立刻投產,風險低,還能通過潛在的重啟、前傳或其他系列擴展帶來顯著的增長空間。
“在多個IP領域,華納兄弟提供了Netflix在較短時間內無法通過自身增長復刻的深度,”美國銀行寫道,更重要的是,鑒于這些IP將補齊Netflix的武器庫,將對公司所各大競爭對手造成致命打擊。“如果Netflix收購華納兄弟,流媒體戰爭基本結束,”埃利希的團隊寫道。以下是如果Netflix動用資金大炮瞄準華納兄弟探索公司,“三鳥”將如何落地。
一石三鳥:鞏固權力
Netflix收購將打下的第一個“鳥”是華納兄弟探索公司本身,因為其流媒體和影業資產將消失,被納入占主導地位的流媒體平臺。
“Netflix將成為好萊塢無可爭議的全球巨頭,甚至超越目前的領先地位,”根據美國銀行的說法,公司掌握的 “內容護城河” 任何獨立流媒體平臺都無法企及,合并后的業務將占據美國流媒體市場逾五分之一份額。
目前,尼爾森數據顯示Netflix約占電視總流媒體觀看時間的18%,HBO Max(華納兄弟探索公司旗下)占3%。合并后的實體將遠超其他競爭對手,如迪士尼(11%)和亞馬遜Prime Video(8%)。只有YouTube(28%)能保持更高市場份額,而很多人認為YouTube才是Netflix真正的對手。
美國銀行還預測,Netflix將繼續通過院線發行華納兄弟的影片,多年來對這家流媒體巨頭來說一直是爭議話題。聯合首席執行官泰德?薩蘭多斯因拒絕配合影片大范圍院線發行,長期跟影院運營商關系緊張,有時甚至劍拔弩張。Netflix在紐約(巴黎劇院)和洛杉磯(埃及劇院)收購了一些精品影院,放映有望沖擊奧斯卡的優質電影,但并不廣泛發行。該策略第一個重大突破可能是格蕾塔?葛韋格即將上映的《納尼亞》改編作品,但薩蘭多斯堅稱該片僅發行IMAX版,這是Netflix首次涉足體育節目,即圣誕節NFL比賽時采用的活動化商業模式。新聞平臺Puck上頗具影響力的馬特?貝洛尼等行業觀察人士質疑,《納尼亞》會不會成為轉折點,而收購華納兄弟探索公司無疑將在這條路上走得更遠。
其他效果
第二和第三只“鳥”直接關乎Netflix的競爭對手。報告指出,對中型傳統媒體/公司來說,很難比得上Netflix的單位經濟效益,也無力抗衡亞馬遜等科技巨頭的生態。Netflix收購華納兄弟探索公司將威脅到派拉蒙天舞和NBC環球(NBCUniversal)“生死存亡”,Netflix強大的防御壁壘也會更加堅不可摧。
通過收購華納兄弟探索公司的工作室和流媒體資產,Netflix將嚴重阻礙派拉蒙+和Peacock全球擴張的雄心。美國銀行團隊特別指出,康卡斯特正處于“關鍵時刻”,因為公司正準備將日益衰退的有線電視網絡分拆為名叫Versant的公司(華納兄弟探索公司也想采用類似戰略),同時其流媒體平臺在美國缺乏規模,在美國境外又不可用。
美國銀行團隊并未探討反壟斷或其他可能影響收購的因素。據悉,近一年來派拉蒙一心想收購華納兄弟探索公司,其控股股東的埃里森家族與白宮關系密切,甲骨文創始人拉里?埃里森作為全球頂級富豪也是人工智能和科技領域的重要力量。埃里森曾與魯珀特?默多克、邁克爾?戴爾等人一起,參與控制TikTok美國業務。如今他的兒子大衛?埃里森執掌派拉蒙,近期任命Free Press的巴里?韋斯擔任主編以重整重塑CBS新聞。如果派拉蒙能將華納兄弟探索公司這顆明珠收入囊中,發展前景將大不一樣。(財富中文網)
譯者:梁宇
審校:夏林
The global media industry is standing at the precipice of a “historic transformation,” with Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) positioned directly at the “epicenter” of a significant shift in asset valuation and competitive strategy, according to Bank of America (BofA) Global Research. With WBD the focus of intense consolidation efforts, attracting bids from at least three key players—Paramount Skydance (PSKY), Netflix (NFLX), and Comcast (CMCSA)—BofA sees nothing less than “industry realignment” as the result of the bidding war.
While there are multiple scenarios for WBD’s future, including a whole-company acquisition by PSKY or a structural engineering combination by CMCSA, BofA highlights the unique strategic leverage afforded to Netflix. The report asserts an acquisition by Netflix could potentially be “killing three birds with one stone,” with WBD the latest must-have asset in the competition once known as “the streaming wars.”
A crown-jewel studio
The intense interest in WBD stems largely from the scarcity premium commanded by its primary asset: the Warner Bros. Studio. WBD’s intellectual property (IP) library, ranging from Harry Potter to DC Comics to Game of Thrones, makes the studio a “crown jewel” asset, BofA said, with one of—if not the most valuable—content libraries in the world. BofA analysts, led by senior media and entertainment analyst Jessica Reif Ehrlich, estimated the takeout value of the consolidated WBD at approximately $30 per share. (It was trading slightly above $24 at press time.)
Netflix’s reported focus is specifically on WBD’s studio and streaming assets, a deal likely to be valued at more than $70 billion. For Netflix, this would represent a significant pivot from building original franchises to buying established “franchise moats.” While Netflix is the undisputed leader in streaming subscribers, it has historically lagged behind other media companies in deep IP libraries that offer potential use cases for theme parks, gaming, merchandising, and Broadway shows.
Building a franchise like Harry Potter “takes a significant amount of time and investment,” BofA notes, while buying it would provide immediate, low-risk engagement, with significant upside from potential reboots, prequels, or other franchise extensions.
“Warner Bros.’ library o?ers a depth that Netflix cannot replicate organically within a reasonably short time frame across several pieces of IP,” BofA writes, but more important, it would be a death blow to all of Netflix’s rivals given this IP would complete the Netflix arsenal. “If Netflix acquires Warner Bros., the streaming wars are e?ectively over,” Ehrlich’s team wrote. Here’s how the birds would fall to the ground if Netflix were to fire its money cannon at WBD.
The triple kill: Consolidating power
The first “bird” killed by a Netflix acquisition would be WBD itself, as its streaming and studio assets would vanish, to be housed within the dominant streaming platform.
“Netflix would become the undisputed global powerhouse of Hollywood beyond even its currently lo?y position,” according to BofA, with a “content moat” that no stand-alone streamer could touch and combined efforts accounting for more than a fifth of U.S. streaming.
Currently, Nielsen data places Netflix at roughly 18% share of total TV streaming viewing time, with HBO Max (WBD) contributing another 3%. A combined entity would far exceed other competitors like Disney (11%) and Amazon Prime Video (8%). Only YouTube (28%), which many argue has become Netflix’s true rival, would retain a larger share size.
BofA also predicts Netflix would continue to o?er Warner Bros. films via theatrical distribution, which has been a controversial subject for years for the big-red streamer. Co-CEO Ted Sarandos has been in a long-running cold—and sometimes hot—war with theater owners over his refusal to play ball with wide releases. Netflix has acquired some boutique theaters in New York (the Paris Theater) and Los Angeles (The Egyptian), where it airs its prestige, Oscar-favorite movies, but it has not played ball with wide releases. The first major crack in this strategy may be Greta Gerwig’s forthcoming Narnia adaptation, but Sarandos has insisted that is limited to IMAX releases only, an event-ized business model Netflix has replicated with its first foray into sports programming, the Christmas Day NFL games. Hollywood watchers like Puck’s influential Matt Belloni have questioned whether Narnia is some kind of tipping point, and a WBD acquisition would surely be a step deeper in that direction.
The other birds
The second and third “birds” relate directly to Netflix’s competitors. The report notes that for midsize legacy media studios/companies, competing with Netflix’s unit economics or the ecosystems of large tech players like Amazon is increasingly difficult. An acquisition of WBD by Netflix would be “existential” for both Paramount Skydance and NBCUniversal (NBCU), effectively solidifying Netflix’s powerful defensive position.
By acquiring WBD’s studio and streaming assets, Netflix would significantly hinder the global scale aspirations of both Paramount+ and Peacock. The BofA team noted Comcast, in particular, is at a “critical juncture” because it is preparing to spin off its declining cable networks into a company known as Versant (a strategy also being pursued by WBD), while it is contending with a streaming platform that both lacks scale domestically and isn’t available outside the U.S.
The BofA team did not discuss antitrust considerations or other factors that may sway the bidding for WBD. Paramount has reportedly been pursuing WBD with a single-minded intensity for close to a year, and its controlling Ellison family has close ties to the White House, with Oracle founder Larry Ellison a power player as one of the world’s richest men and a major force in AI and technology. Ellison was one of the key names, along with Rupert Murdoch and Michael Dell, who emerged in the group controlling the U.S. arm of TikTok. A Paramount run by his son, David Ellison, who recently moved to reshape CBS News with the appointment of the Free Press’s Bari Weiss as editor-in-chief, would be a very different prospect with a new jewel in its crown.