當一些美國加州的億萬富翁猛烈抨擊擬征收的財富稅,并選擇與加州“切割”之際,另有一些富裕人士站出來支持該政策。
戴夫·尼克松曾經是一名醫療健康行業高管,他于2022年從佛羅里達州搬到加州帕薩迪納,希望尋找一個在價值觀上更契合的社區。他是“愛國百萬富翁”(Patriotic Millionaires)組織的成員。該組織由一群美國富人組成,倡導建立更公平的稅收體系、可維持生活的體面工資以及平等的政治參與機會。
尼克松在接受《財富》雜志采訪時表示:“我只是覺得,在佛羅里達州,教育、醫療這些我所關注的能夠改善社會公平的事情,并沒有得到應有的重視。我依然認為,加州在這些重要議題上做得更出色。”
加州最新提出的“巨富稅”方案《2026年億萬富翁稅法案》(2026 Billionaire Tax Act),擬對凈資產超過10億美元的居民,按其總資產的5%征稅。除現有的所得稅和資本利得稅外,該群體目前并不需要繳納任何經常性的財富稅。該措施預計可以籌集約1,000億美元資金,其中約90%將用于醫療項目,其余部分則用于教育、食品援助,以及通過設立專項儲備基金來承擔該稅種的行政管理成本。
尼克松此前曾經在《財富》雜志撰文,對一些富裕居民威脅離開紐約、伊利諾伊等高稅州,遷居佛羅里達、得克薩斯等低稅州的做法,表達了強烈不滿。他至今仍然對“加稅會引發富人大規模外逃”的說法持懷疑態度。
他寫道:“這種說法純屬虛構,是美國各地的百萬富翁經常拋出的空洞威脅,只是為了阻止州立法者提高稅率。加州對像我這樣的富裕人群征收更高的稅,恰恰是它可以成為我理想定居之所的原因。”
圍繞這項擬議中的稅收政策,加州200多位億萬富翁紛紛表態,觀點不一。據報道,風險投資人彼得·蒂爾,以及谷歌(Google)創始人拉里·佩奇和謝爾蓋·布林,正在準備離開加州遷居佛羅里達州。也有其他億萬富翁持不同立場,例如英偉達(Nvidia)首席執行官黃仁勛就表示,“從未考慮過”因為稅收問題而離開加州。
當被問及谷歌創始人謝爾蓋·布林和拉里·佩奇近期的舉動時,尼克松直言不諱地說:“這種行為卑劣又貪婪。”
尼克松稱:“加州一直待他們不薄,并且培育了一個令谷歌創始人受益的創新經濟生態。”長久以來,加州都是大型科技公司的大本營,并通過稅收優惠等方式鼓勵企業留在本州發展。2025年,加州還與谷歌、Adobe、IBM和微軟(Microsoft)簽署協議,將人工智能培訓引入高中、社區學院以及加州州立大學體系。
尼克松表示:“任何不把繳納公平稅收視為自身責任的人,都令我失望。”
“繳納公平稅收”
“愛國百萬富翁”組織的另一名成員莫琳·肯尼迪,是一位居住在馬林縣的慈善人士,自1996年以來一直在加州生活。她曾經在美國前總統比爾·克林頓執政期間擔任聯邦住房政策官員。她表示,州政府有責任設法抵消醫療支出。她認同該項稅收政策背后的立法初衷,即通過征收“巨富稅”,為醫療、教育和食品援助提供資金支持。
肯尼迪稱:“加州的生活成本很高,而醫療支出的漲幅一直高于工資增長速度。”根據美國社會保障署(Social Security Administration)的數據,2022年至2023年間,醫療支出增長7.5%,而同期平均工資僅增長4.43%。美世(Mercer)的一項調查顯示,如果雇主不主動采取措施降低成本,2026年的醫療成本預計將上漲9%。
“大而美法案”(One Big Beautiful Bill Act)計劃在未來十年削減近萬億美元醫療補助(Medicaid)資金、并新增工作要求,受此影響,預計將有約340萬加州居民失去MediCal醫療保障資格。
肯尼迪說:“在加州,像我退休前那樣的高收入工薪群體,要將相當高比例的收入用來繳稅,但億萬富翁階層卻不用承擔這樣的稅負。”
根據美國國家經濟研究局(National Bureau of Economic Research )在2025年發布的一篇論文,2018年至2020年間,億萬富翁的平均稅率為24%,而全體人口的平均稅率為30%,高收入工薪群體的平均稅率則高達45%。(財富中文網)
譯者:劉進龍
當一些美國加州的億萬富翁猛烈抨擊擬征收的財富稅,并選擇與加州“切割”之際,另有一些富裕人士站出來支持該政策。
戴夫·尼克松曾經是一名醫療健康行業高管,他于2022年從佛羅里達州搬到加州帕薩迪納,希望尋找一個在價值觀上更契合的社區。他是“愛國百萬富翁”(Patriotic Millionaires)組織的成員。該組織由一群美國富人組成,倡導建立更公平的稅收體系、可維持生活的體面工資以及平等的政治參與機會。
尼克松在接受《財富》雜志采訪時表示:“我只是覺得,在佛羅里達州,教育、醫療這些我所關注的能夠改善社會公平的事情,并沒有得到應有的重視。我依然認為,加州在這些重要議題上做得更出色。”
加州最新提出的“巨富稅”方案《2026年億萬富翁稅法案》(2026 Billionaire Tax Act),擬對凈資產超過10億美元的居民,按其總資產的5%征稅。除現有的所得稅和資本利得稅外,該群體目前并不需要繳納任何經常性的財富稅。該措施預計可以籌集約1,000億美元資金,其中約90%將用于醫療項目,其余部分則用于教育、食品援助,以及通過設立專項儲備基金來承擔該稅種的行政管理成本。
尼克松此前曾經在《財富》雜志撰文,對一些富裕居民威脅離開紐約、伊利諾伊等高稅州,遷居佛羅里達、得克薩斯等低稅州的做法,表達了強烈不滿。他至今仍然對“加稅會引發富人大規模外逃”的說法持懷疑態度。
他寫道:“這種說法純屬虛構,是美國各地的百萬富翁經常拋出的空洞威脅,只是為了阻止州立法者提高稅率。加州對像我這樣的富裕人群征收更高的稅,恰恰是它可以成為我理想定居之所的原因。”
圍繞這項擬議中的稅收政策,加州200多位億萬富翁紛紛表態,觀點不一。據報道,風險投資人彼得·蒂爾,以及谷歌(Google)創始人拉里·佩奇和謝爾蓋·布林,正在準備離開加州遷居佛羅里達州。也有其他億萬富翁持不同立場,例如英偉達(Nvidia)首席執行官黃仁勛就表示,“從未考慮過”因為稅收問題而離開加州。
當被問及谷歌創始人謝爾蓋·布林和拉里·佩奇近期的舉動時,尼克松直言不諱地說:“這種行為卑劣又貪婪。”
尼克松稱:“加州一直待他們不薄,并且培育了一個令谷歌創始人受益的創新經濟生態。”長久以來,加州都是大型科技公司的大本營,并通過稅收優惠等方式鼓勵企業留在本州發展。2025年,加州還與谷歌、Adobe、IBM和微軟(Microsoft)簽署協議,將人工智能培訓引入高中、社區學院以及加州州立大學體系。
尼克松表示:“任何不把繳納公平稅收視為自身責任的人,都令我失望。”
“繳納公平稅收”
“愛國百萬富翁”組織的另一名成員莫琳·肯尼迪,是一位居住在馬林縣的慈善人士,自1996年以來一直在加州生活。她曾經在美國前總統比爾·克林頓執政期間擔任聯邦住房政策官員。她表示,州政府有責任設法抵消醫療支出。她認同該項稅收政策背后的立法初衷,即通過征收“巨富稅”,為醫療、教育和食品援助提供資金支持。
肯尼迪稱:“加州的生活成本很高,而醫療支出的漲幅一直高于工資增長速度。”根據美國社會保障署(Social Security Administration)的數據,2022年至2023年間,醫療支出增長7.5%,而同期平均工資僅增長4.43%。美世(Mercer)的一項調查顯示,如果雇主不主動采取措施降低成本,2026年的醫療成本預計將上漲9%。
“大而美法案”(One Big Beautiful Bill Act)計劃在未來十年削減近萬億美元醫療補助(Medicaid)資金、并新增工作要求,受此影響,預計將有約340萬加州居民失去MediCal醫療保障資格。
肯尼迪說:“在加州,像我退休前那樣的高收入工薪群體,要將相當高比例的收入用來繳稅,但億萬富翁階層卻不用承擔這樣的稅負。”
根據美國國家經濟研究局(National Bureau of Economic Research )在2025年發布的一篇論文,2018年至2020年間,億萬富翁的平均稅率為24%,而全體人口的平均稅率為30%,高收入工薪群體的平均稅率則高達45%。(財富中文網)
譯者:劉進龍
While some California billionaires are slamming the proposed wealth tax and cutting ties with the state, other wealthy citizens are stepping forward to defend the policy.
Dave Nixon, a former healthcare executive, relocated from Florida to Pasadena, California, in 2022 in search of a community that more closely aligned with his values. He is a member of Patriotic Millionaires, an organization of affluent Americans that advocates for a fairer tax system, livable wages, and equal access to political power.
“I just felt like education, healthcare, all the things I care about that equalize society, were not being paid attention to [in Florida],” Nixon said in an interview with Fortune. “I still think that California does a better job on those things that matter.”
California’s latest proposal to tax extreme wealth, the 2026 Billionaire Tax Act, would impose a one-time 5% levy on the net worth of residents with assets of at least $1 billion, a category that currently pays no recurring wealth tax beyond existing income and capital-gains taxes. The measure is projected to raise on the order of $100 billion and would channel roughly 90% of the new revenue into health care programs, with the remainder earmarked for education, food assistance, and administering the tax through a dedicated reserve fund.
Nixon previously wrote in Fortune about his disapproval of wealthy residents threatening to leave high-tax states such as New York and Illinois for lower-tax states like Florida and Texas. He remains skeptical of the claim that raising taxes will prompt a widespread flight of wealthy residents.
“That idea is a myth, an empty threat constantly laid down by millionaires across the country looking for a way to discourage state lawmakers from raising their taxes,” he wrote. “California’s higher taxes on wealthy people like me are exactly what makes it the kind of state I want to live in.”
Many of the state’s more than 200 billionaires have weighed in on the proposed tax policy, with varying opinions. Venture capitalist Peter Thiel and Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin are reportedly preparing to abandon the state for Florida. Other billionaires such, as Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, said it “never crossed [his] mind” to leave the state because of the tax.
When asked about Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page’s recent actions, Nixon said, “It’s sickening and greedy.”
“California has been very good to them and has supported an innovation economy that, for example, the founders of Google have benefited from,” Nixon said. The state has long been home to Big Tech and has incentivized companies to stay and grow through tax credits. In 2025, California signed deals with Google, Adobe, IBM, and Microsoft, to bring AI training into high schools, community colleges, and the California State University system.
“I’m just disappointed in anybody that doesn’t see it as a responsibility to pay their fair share of taxes,” Nixon said.
‘Get them to pay their fair share’
Maureen Kennedy, another member of Patriotic Millionaires, is a philanthropist based in Marin County who has lived in California since 1996. A former federal housing policy official under former President Bill Clinton, she said it’s up to the state to figure out how to offset healthcare costs. She agrees with the rationale behind the bill, which would use the tax to fund health care, education, and food assistance.
“We’re a high-cost state, and [healthcare costs] have been outstripping increases in wages,” Kennedy said. Health spending increased 7.5% between 2022 and 2023, whereas average wages grew by 4.43% during that period, according to the Social Security Administration. Employers expect healthcare costs to increase by 9% in 2026 if they don’t try to lower costs, according to a survey from Mercer.
About 3.4 million Californians are expected to lose MediCal coverage after the One Big Beautiful Bill Act cut nearly a trillion dollars from Medicaid over the next ten years and added new work requirements.
“Higher income working people like I was before I retired pay a very large percentage of their income in California, but the billionaire class don’t pay that,” Kennedy said.
Billionaires averaged a 24% tax rate between 2018 and 2020, compared with 30% for the total population and 45% for top income earners, according to a 2025 paper published in the National Bureau of Economic Research.