
美國看上去并不像一個陷入財政困境的國家,這恰恰是問題所在。
過去五年,標準普爾500指數(S&P 500)的漲幅超過一倍,失業(yè)率降至數十年來的低點,社會保障金仍然照常發(fā)放。
然而,這些表象之下,或許潛藏著更深層次的脆弱性。中東局勢日益緊張(美伊沖突升級),這提醒我們經濟形勢可能驟然生變。一旦全球石油供應中斷,能源價格或將飆升,進而再度引發(fā)通脹并推高利率。對于一個已經背負超過38萬億美元債務、債務利息支出甚至超過國防開支的國家而言,此類沖擊會給聯邦財政帶來更大的壓力。
潛在趨勢已經令人深感憂慮。美國國債正在攀升至和平時期前所未有的高位,預計未來十年內,聯邦債務占到國內生產總值(GDP)的比重將升至約120%。這意味著聯邦政府的債務將超過美國全年經濟總產出。
這一趨勢不會在一夜之間觸發(fā)警報。正如歐內斯特·海明威所寫,破產“開始是每況愈下,接著便是一瀉千里”。財政衰敗亦是如此。
成立兩黨財政委員會,能夠為議員提供一個制度化的、具備公信力的議事平臺,使各方將所有議題擺上臺面,制定改革方案,從而在財政漸進式惡化演變?yōu)檎嬲C之前,穩(wěn)定國家財政根基。
美國國債已經超過38萬億美元,如今每年的債務利息支出已經超過軍費開支。社會保障(Social Security)和聯邦醫(yī)療保險(Medicare)的核心信托基金,預計將在未來七年內耗盡。屆時將觸發(fā)福利支出自動削減,抑或是通過擴大財政赤字來填補這些項目的資金缺口。隨著人口老齡化加劇、醫(yī)療成本上升及經濟增速放緩,這些財政壓力只會持續(xù)加碼。
對于美國企業(yè)而言,這場迫在眉睫的債務危機,將帶來切實的現實沖擊。政府債務高企迫使聯邦政府增加利息支出,進而擠占基礎設施、教育、國防與社會福利等領域的公共投入。倘若投資者開始認為美國債務風險上升,利率可能進一步攀升,進而推高企業(yè)擴張、招聘和投資的借貸成本。
英國便是前車之鑒。2022年,時任英國首相?的利茲·特拉斯宣布實施數十年來規(guī)模最大的減稅計劃,其資金主要依靠財政赤字支撐。此舉引發(fā)金融市場動蕩,英鎊大幅貶值,甚至威脅到英國養(yǎng)老基金的償付能力。短短幾周內,首相和財政大臣便被迫辭職。美國經濟體量更大,且美元擁有儲備貨幣地位,但市場信心在逐漸喪失后一朝崩塌的動態(tài)變化,與英國的情況并無二致。
在國會設立兩黨財政委員會以應對債務危機,雖然無法一夜之間解決問題,但可以打破兩黨僵局,推動兩黨攜手探尋解決方案,賦予改革方案兩黨共同背書的公信力,同時提升公眾認知、贏得公眾支持。這一機制既能夠為改革賦予兩黨共同背書的公信力,也可以筑牢民意基礎,推動國會采取行動。
該委員會應該設定三大核心戰(zhàn)略目標:改善聯邦政府的長期財政狀況、將預期的債務與國內生產總值之比控制在更可持續(xù)的水平(例如100%),以及解決社會保障與聯邦醫(yī)療保險信托基金的長期償付能力問題。
委員會若要取得成功,就必須將所有相關議題擺上臺面。委員會應該對聯邦政府所有的財政支出與收入來源,進行一次自上而下的全面審查。為避免政治推進動力流失,設立委員會的相關法案需要設定嚴格的時間表,并承諾在眾議院和參議院進行投票表決。法案通過后,國會應該建立強有力的執(zhí)行機制,以確保后續(xù)財政決策不偏離新的財政軌道。
美國民眾必須認清其中的利害關系。有必要發(fā)起一場全民教育活動,闡釋財政危機的嚴峻性,廣泛征集公眾意見,凝聚推動國會采取行動的政治共識。這項工作尤其應該聚焦受債務危機影響最大的群體——年輕一代、低收入群體,以及三明治一代。
美國的債務危機已然來臨。組建兩黨財政委員會,制定系統性方案化解國家債務困境、推動國會采取行動,已經是當務之急。唯有如此,我們才能為子孫后代守護國家的繁榮。
大衛(wèi)·K·楊(David K. Young)擔任經濟發(fā)展委員會(Committee for Economic Development)主席,該委員會是美國經濟咨商局(The Conference Board)下設的公共政策研究中心。
大衛(wèi)曾經擔任全球頂尖地緣政治與宏觀經濟分析咨詢機構牛津分析(Oxford Analytica)的首席執(zhí)行官。在加入牛津分析之前,他曾經在源訊公司(Atos)擔任管理顧問。
Fortune.com上發(fā)表的評論文章中表達的觀點,僅代表作者本人的觀點,不代表《財富》雜志的觀點和立場。(財富中文網)
譯者:中慧言-王芳
美國看上去并不像一個陷入財政困境的國家,這恰恰是問題所在。
過去五年,標準普爾500指數(S&P 500)的漲幅超過一倍,失業(yè)率降至數十年來的低點,社會保障金仍然照常發(fā)放。
然而,這些表象之下,或許潛藏著更深層次的脆弱性。中東局勢日益緊張(美伊沖突升級),這提醒我們經濟形勢可能驟然生變。一旦全球石油供應中斷,能源價格或將飆升,進而再度引發(fā)通脹并推高利率。對于一個已經背負超過38萬億美元債務、債務利息支出甚至超過國防開支的國家而言,此類沖擊會給聯邦財政帶來更大的壓力。
潛在趨勢已經令人深感憂慮。美國國債正在攀升至和平時期前所未有的高位,預計未來十年內,聯邦債務占到國內生產總值(GDP)的比重將升至約120%。這意味著聯邦政府的債務將超過美國全年經濟總產出。
這一趨勢不會在一夜之間觸發(fā)警報。正如歐內斯特·海明威所寫,破產“開始是每況愈下,接著便是一瀉千里”。財政衰敗亦是如此。
成立兩黨財政委員會,能夠為議員提供一個制度化的、具備公信力的議事平臺,使各方將所有議題擺上臺面,制定改革方案,從而在財政漸進式惡化演變?yōu)檎嬲C之前,穩(wěn)定國家財政根基。
美國國債已經超過38萬億美元,如今每年的債務利息支出已經超過軍費開支。社會保障(Social Security)和聯邦醫(yī)療保險(Medicare)的核心信托基金,預計將在未來七年內耗盡。屆時將觸發(fā)福利支出自動削減,抑或是通過擴大財政赤字來填補這些項目的資金缺口。隨著人口老齡化加劇、醫(yī)療成本上升及經濟增速放緩,這些財政壓力只會持續(xù)加碼。
對于美國企業(yè)而言,這場迫在眉睫的債務危機,將帶來切實的現實沖擊。政府債務高企迫使聯邦政府增加利息支出,進而擠占基礎設施、教育、國防與社會福利等領域的公共投入。倘若投資者開始認為美國債務風險上升,利率可能進一步攀升,進而推高企業(yè)擴張、招聘和投資的借貸成本。
英國便是前車之鑒。2022年,時任英國首相?的利茲·特拉斯宣布實施數十年來規(guī)模最大的減稅計劃,其資金主要依靠財政赤字支撐。此舉引發(fā)金融市場動蕩,英鎊大幅貶值,甚至威脅到英國養(yǎng)老基金的償付能力。短短幾周內,首相和財政大臣便被迫辭職。美國經濟體量更大,且美元擁有儲備貨幣地位,但市場信心在逐漸喪失后一朝崩塌的動態(tài)變化,與英國的情況并無二致。
在國會設立兩黨財政委員會以應對債務危機,雖然無法一夜之間解決問題,但可以打破兩黨僵局,推動兩黨攜手探尋解決方案,賦予改革方案兩黨共同背書的公信力,同時提升公眾認知、贏得公眾支持。這一機制既能夠為改革賦予兩黨共同背書的公信力,也可以筑牢民意基礎,推動國會采取行動。
該委員會應該設定三大核心戰(zhàn)略目標:改善聯邦政府的長期財政狀況、將預期的債務與國內生產總值之比控制在更可持續(xù)的水平(例如100%),以及解決社會保障與聯邦醫(yī)療保險信托基金的長期償付能力問題。
委員會若要取得成功,就必須將所有相關議題擺上臺面。委員會應該對聯邦政府所有的財政支出與收入來源,進行一次自上而下的全面審查。為避免政治推進動力流失,設立委員會的相關法案需要設定嚴格的時間表,并承諾在眾議院和參議院進行投票表決。法案通過后,國會應該建立強有力的執(zhí)行機制,以確保后續(xù)財政決策不偏離新的財政軌道。
美國民眾必須認清其中的利害關系。有必要發(fā)起一場全民教育活動,闡釋財政危機的嚴峻性,廣泛征集公眾意見,凝聚推動國會采取行動的政治共識。這項工作尤其應該聚焦受債務危機影響最大的群體——年輕一代、低收入群體,以及三明治一代。
美國的債務危機已然來臨。組建兩黨財政委員會,制定系統性方案化解國家債務困境、推動國會采取行動,已經是當務之急。唯有如此,我們才能為子孫后代守護國家的繁榮。
大衛(wèi)·K·楊(David K. Young)擔任經濟發(fā)展委員會(Committee for Economic Development)主席,該委員會是美國經濟咨商局(The Conference Board)下設的公共政策研究中心。
大衛(wèi)曾經擔任全球頂尖地緣政治與宏觀經濟分析咨詢機構牛津分析(Oxford Analytica)的首席執(zhí)行官。在加入牛津分析之前,他曾經在源訊公司(Atos)擔任管理顧問。
Fortune.com上發(fā)表的評論文章中表達的觀點,僅代表作者本人的觀點,不代表《財富》雜志的觀點和立場。(財富中文網)
譯者:中慧言-王芳
America does not look like a nation in fiscal distress—and that’s exactly the problem.
The S&P 500 has more than doubled in the past five years. Unemployment is at a multi-decade low. Social Security checks are going out.
But moments like these can hide deeper vulnerabilities. Rising tensions in the Middle East, including the conflict with Iran, are a reminder of how quickly economic conditions can shift. A disruption to global oil supplies could send energy prices higher, reigniting inflation and pushing interest rates upward. For a country already carrying more than $38 trillion in debt and spending more on interest than on national defense, that kind of shock would put even greater strain on federal finances.
And the underlying trend is already troubling. The national debt is on track to reach levels never seen outside of wartime—projected to climb to roughly 120% of GDP within the next decade. That means that the federal government would owe more than the entire annual output of the US economy.
That trajectory will not trigger an alarm bell overnight. As Ernest Hemingway wrote, bankruptcy happens “gradually and then suddenly.” The same can be true of fiscal decline.
A bipartisan fiscal commission offers a structured, credible forum for lawmakers to put everything on the table and produce a package of reforms capable of stabilizing the nation’s finances before gradual erosion becomes genuine crisis.
The US has over $38 trillion of national debt. We now spend more annually on interest than on the military. The primary trust funds for Social Security and Medicare are also projected to become insolvent within the next seven years, requiring an automatic benefit cut or even more deficit spending to backfill these programs. These pressures will intensify as the population ages, health care costs rise, and economic growth slows.
For American businesses, the looming debt crisis carries tangible, real-world consequences. High levels of government debt require the federal government to spend more on interest payments, leaving fewer resources available for infrastructure, education, national defense, and social programs. If investors begin to view US debt as riskier, interest rates could rise further, increasing borrowing costs for expansion, hiring, and investment.
The U.K. offered a preview. In 2022, Prime Minister Liz Truss announced some of the largest tax cuts in decades primarily financed via deficit spending, financial markets were rattled, causing precipitous declines in the value of the pound and threatening the solvency of British pension funds. Within weeks, the prime minister and the country’s finance head were forced to resign. The U.S. economy is larger and the dollar holds reserve currency status—but the dynamic of confidence lost suddenly after building gradually is the same.
Establishing a bipartisan fiscal commission in Congress to address the debt crisis would not solve the problem overnight, but it could break partisan logjams, focus both political parties on finding a solution, bring bipartisan credibility to reforms, and encourage public awareness and support. It would bring bipartisan credibility to reforms and build the public mandate needed for Congress to act.
The commission’s three primary strategic objectives should be to improve the long-term fiscal condition of the federal government, hold the expected debt-to-GDP ratio to a more sustainable level (such as 100%), and address the long-term solvency of the Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds.
For a commission to be successful, everything must be on the table. The commission should undertake a top-to-bottom review of all federal spending and revenue sources. To avoid losing political momentum, the law establishing the commission should include strict timelines and commitments for votes on the House and Senate floor. Following enactment, Congress should adopt strong enforcement mechanisms for future fiscal decisions to avoid altering the new fiscal trajectory.
The American people must understand the stakes. A public education campaign should explain the fiscal crisis, invite broad input, and build the political will needed for Congress to act. This effort should focus especially on groups most vulnerable to a debt crisis—younger generations, low-income communities, and the “sandwich” generation.
The U.S. debt crisis is already here. Forming a bipartisan fiscal commission is an immediate first step in developing a comprehensive plan to address the national debt and forcing action in Congress. Only then can we preserve our national prosperity for future generations.
David K. Young is President of the Committee for Economic Development, the public policy center of The Conference Board (CED).
Previously, David was CEO of Oxford Analytica, a leading geopolitical and macroeconomic analysis and advisory firm. Prior to his time at Oxford Analytica, David was a management consultant at Atos.
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.