日韩中文字幕在线一区二区三区,亚洲热视频在线观看,久久精品午夜一区二区福利,精品一区二区三区在线观看l,麻花传媒剧电影,亚洲香蕉伊综合在人在线,免费av一区二区三区在线,亚洲成在线人视频观看

           
          |
          |
          |
          |
          |
          |
          |
          |
          |
          |
           
          The 5 best and 5 worst private equity funds
          作者: Dan Primack    時間: 2010年09月20日    來源: 財富中文網
           位置:投資理財         
          字體 [   ]        
          打印         
          發表評論        





          ????The California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) has the nation's largest private equity portfolio, and recently updated fund-by-fund performance data on its website. These are the numbers by which PE investors really are judged, so I figured it was worth a quick look to see the five best -- and five worst -- performing funds within the CalPERS portfolio.

          ????Because private equity is a long-term asset class characterized by J-curvature, I've excluded all funds raised between 2007 and 2010. The relevant metric is net IRR. All data is through March 31. Here goes:

          ????THE BEST:

          ????1. Clearstone Venture Partners 1-B (1999): 154.7%

          ????2. T3 Partners II (2001): 95.6%

          ????3. GCP California Fund (2003): 91.9%

          ????4. WLR Recovery Fund II (2002): 79.5%

          ????5. Permira Europe I (1997): 74.5%

          ????THE WORST

          ????1. Aberdare II Annex Fund (2006): -46.6%

          ????2. Exxel Capital Partners V (1998): -41.7%

          ????3. Opportunity Capital Partners IV: -28.9%

          ????4. Convergence Ventures II (1999): -28.5%

          ????5. Richardson Capital Private Equity 2 (2006): -28.1%




          相關閱讀
          用戶名: 密碼:      匿名


          0條評論          查看更多評論